Most Read: Business

DJIA
0.51%
S&P 500
0.52%
NASDAQ
0.24%
 Last Update: 04:21 AM 11/24/2014

World Markets from      

 

Other Market Data from      

 

Key Rates from      

 

Blog Contributors

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee covers technology policy, including copyright and patent law, telecom regulation, privacy, and free speech. He also writes about the economics of technology. He has previously written for Ars Technica and Forbes. You can follow him on Twitter or send him email.

Brian Fung

Brian Fung

Brian Fung covers technology for The Washington Post, focusing on electronic privacy, national security, digital politics and the Internet that binds it all together. He was previously the technology correspondent for National Journal and an associate editor at the Atlantic. His writing has also appeared in Foreign Policy, Talking Points Memo, the American Prospect and Nonprofit Quarterly. Follow Brian on Google+ .

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson covers technology policy for The Washington Post, with an emphasis on cybersecurity, consumer privacy, transparency, surveillance and open government. She also delves into the societal impacts of technology access and how innovation is intertwined with cultural development.

Post Tech
About / Where's Post I.T.?   |    Twitter  |   On Facebook  |  RSS RSS Feed  |  E-Mail Cecilia
Posted at 01:06 PM ET, 11/16/2011

Battle over Stop Online Piracy Act reaches fever pitch

The battle over controversial anti-piracy legislation reached fever pitch on Wednesday, as opponents of the House bill launched an advertising blitz ahead of a morning hearing.

Supporters meanwhile brought union leaders, Hollywood, retailers and the law enforcement officials to a hearing during the day to argue for lawmakers to pass the legislation.

Web giants Google, Facebook, eBay and AOL ran full-page advertisements in newspapers, including The Post, asking lawmakers to reconsider the legislation. Internet service providers, including Verizon, are also expressing concern with the bill.

The debate has intensified as opponents characterize the House bill as a sudden push by Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Tex) that could dramatically affect Web giants and Internet service providers, who say they weren’t consulted in the drafting of legislation. Smith has said he hopes to move the House Stop Online Piracy Act to markup before the end of the year.

A similar Senate bill passed the Judiciary Committee in September.

The legislative push heartened supporters that include Hollywood studios, record labels, drug makers and retailers who have for years complained of fighting a losing battle against Internet trade of counterfeit goods and the illegal exchange of copyrighted material.

Fundamentally, this is about jobs,” said Michael O’Leary, a hearing witness representing the Motion Picture Association of America. He argued that not just actresses and directors are affected; piracy has a ripple effect across thousands of businesses that are associated with the movie business.

Critics of the House bill say it goes too far. They say a Senate bill authored by Sen. Pat Leahy (D-Vt.) is more moderate. Ideally, they would want an amendment to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, that gives companies shelter from enforcement if they demonstrate best efforts to stop piracy.

A Verizon executive said in an interview Wednesday that language in Smith’s bill could force telecom companies to block Web sites that are dedicated to pirated copy.

“We worked with the Senate on the bill and that is reflected in the language of that bill,” the Verizon executive said, speaking on the condition of anonymity because of the company’s hopes to be included in revisions of Smith’s bill. “But the House bill, the way it is written, could mean we would have to take down domain names, use deep packet inspection technology and a range of technically difficult things to enforce this legislation.”

Smith said in a statement that current law doesn’t adequately help media and other firms that are seeing rampant stealing of their content.

He said his bill is aimed at foreign rogue sites and would only apply to sites that are “dedicated” to pirated copy.

“The problem of rogue Web sites is real, immediate and wide-spread.  It harms all sectors of the economy,” he said.

By  |  01:06 PM ET, 11/16/2011

 
Read what others are saying
     

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company