Most Read: Business

 Last Update: 2:47 PM 04/27/2015(NASDAQ&DJIA)

World Markets from      


Other Market Data from      


Key Rates from      


Blog Contributors

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee covers technology policy, including copyright and patent law, telecom regulation, privacy, and free speech. He also writes about the economics of technology. He has previously written for Ars Technica and Forbes. You can follow him on Twitter or send him email.

Brian Fung

Brian Fung

Brian Fung covers technology for The Washington Post, focusing on electronic privacy, national security, digital politics and the Internet that binds it all together. He was previously the technology correspondent for National Journal and an associate editor at the Atlantic. His writing has also appeared in Foreign Policy, Talking Points Memo, the American Prospect and Nonprofit Quarterly. Follow Brian on Google+ .

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson covers technology policy for The Washington Post, with an emphasis on cybersecurity, consumer privacy, transparency, surveillance and open government. She also delves into the societal impacts of technology access and how innovation is intertwined with cultural development.

Post Tech
About / Where's Post I.T.?   |    Twitter  |   On Facebook  |  RSS RSS Feed  |  E-Mail Cecilia
Posted at 02:33 PM ET, 06/09/2011

California retailer, FTC settle over false Web site

The Federal Trade Commission settled with a California retailer accused of tricking British customers into believing its site was based in the United Kingdom.

Jaivin Karnani, of the company Balls of Kryptonite, allegedly sold products through several Web sites using the British top-level domain,

British customers believed that they were purchasing goods protected by warranties in the UK and were surprised by high import fees, the FTC said in a release. Customers who tried to cancel their orders complained that the company did not respond or tried to charge high cancellation fees.

The settlement order prevents the company from misrepresenting the location of its goods and from charging customers for items until they are “in hand and ready to be shipped.”

The defendants are also not allowed to misrepresent their compliance with government-sponsored information security programs, their own sales policies and the total cost of goods.

The company was charged with $500,000 judgment, which has been waived based on its inability to pay.

By  |  02:33 PM ET, 06/09/2011

Tags:  FTC

Read what others are saying

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company