Most Read: Business

DJIA
0.4%
NASDAQ
-0.1%
 Last Update: 4:06 PM 04/28/2015(NASDAQ&DJIA)

World Markets from      

 

Other Market Data from      

 

Key Rates from      

 

Blog Contributors

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee covers technology policy, including copyright and patent law, telecom regulation, privacy, and free speech. He also writes about the economics of technology. He has previously written for Ars Technica and Forbes. You can follow him on Twitter or send him email.

Brian Fung

Brian Fung

Brian Fung covers technology for The Washington Post, focusing on electronic privacy, national security, digital politics and the Internet that binds it all together. He was previously the technology correspondent for National Journal and an associate editor at the Atlantic. His writing has also appeared in Foreign Policy, Talking Points Memo, the American Prospect and Nonprofit Quarterly. Follow Brian on Google+ .

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson covers technology policy for The Washington Post, with an emphasis on cybersecurity, consumer privacy, transparency, surveillance and open government. She also delves into the societal impacts of technology access and how innovation is intertwined with cultural development.

Post Tech
About / Where's Post I.T.?   |    Twitter  |   On Facebook  |  RSS RSS Feed  |  E-Mail Cecilia
Posted at 04:16 PM ET, 11/02/2011

Court rules against FCC’s fining of Janet Jackson wardrobe error


FILE - In this Feb. 1, 2004 file photo, singers Justin Timberlake and Janet Jackson are seen during their performance prior to a wardrobe malfunction during the half time performance at Super Bowl XXXVIII in Houston. A federal appeals court ruled Wednesday, Nov. 2, 2011 that CBS should not be fined $550,000 for Janet Jackson's infamous “wardrobe malfunction.” (AP Photo/David Phillip, file) (DAVID PHILLIP - AP)
It’s the wardrobe error that never seems to go out of style.

A federal appeals court on Wednesday ruled against the Federal Communications Commission for fining CBS for airing singer Janet Jackson’s notorious costume malfunction during a halftime performance for the 2004 Super Bowl.

It was the second time The 3rd Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals of Philadelphia ruled against the FCC, saying the agency “acted arbitrarily” with its $550,000 fine on CBS because it didn’t make clear its intolerance for brief nudity. The court reviewed the case again after the Supreme Court in 2009 upheld the FCC’s decision.

Jackson’s right breast was exposed for nine-sixteenths of a second, the court noted.

But advocates of greater indecency enforcement said the court’s decision ignores a clear protest by many families over the incident.

“Today’s ruling reaches the level of judicial stupidity and is a sucker-punch to families everywhere,” said Tim Winter, president of the Parents Television Council.

The episode has challenged the FCC’s patrolling of indecency on the nation’s broadcast airwaves. The Supreme Court in January will review the agency’s enforcement of fleeting curse words and images, which include nudity.

On Wednesday, the Philadelphia court ruled that the FCC had the authority to ban fleeting expletives and indecent images on TV. But it said the agency’s enforcement of nudity appeared a change in policy that wasn’t clear to broadcasters.

The FCC said it was pleased that the court reaffirmed its ability to police broadcasting for indecency. But it said it was disappointed in the decision.

“The FCC will continue to use all of the authority at its disposal to ensure that the nation’s broadcasters fulfill the public interest responsibilities that accompany their use of the public airwaves,” a FCC spokesman said.

By  |  04:16 PM ET, 11/02/2011

 
Read what others are saying
     

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company