Most Read: Business

DJIA
0.51%
S&P 500
0.52%
NASDAQ
0.24%
 Last Update: 02:11 AM 11/23/2014

World Markets from      

 

Other Market Data from      

 

Key Rates from      

 

Blog Contributors

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee covers technology policy, including copyright and patent law, telecom regulation, privacy, and free speech. He also writes about the economics of technology. He has previously written for Ars Technica and Forbes. You can follow him on Twitter or send him email.

Brian Fung

Brian Fung

Brian Fung covers technology for The Washington Post, focusing on electronic privacy, national security, digital politics and the Internet that binds it all together. He was previously the technology correspondent for National Journal and an associate editor at the Atlantic. His writing has also appeared in Foreign Policy, Talking Points Memo, the American Prospect and Nonprofit Quarterly. Follow Brian on Google+ .

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson covers technology policy for The Washington Post, with an emphasis on cybersecurity, consumer privacy, transparency, surveillance and open government. She also delves into the societal impacts of technology access and how innovation is intertwined with cultural development.

Post Tech
About / Where's Post I.T.?   |    Twitter  |   On Facebook  |  RSS RSS Feed  |  E-Mail Cecilia
Posted at 11:29 AM ET, 02/22/2012

Critics tell FCC to block Verizon deal with cable firms


(Justin Sullivan - GETTY IMAGES)
T-Mobile and public interest groups on Tuesday urged the Federal Communications Commission to block Verizon Wireless’ spectrum and marketing deal with cable firms, saying the transaction would lead to less competition and higher wireless service fees for consumers.

In filings late Tuesday at the FCC, T-Mobile said the $3.9 billion sale of airwaves to Verizon by cable firms would create “excessive concentration” in the wireless market. Verizon Wireless is the nation’s biggest wireless service provider with more than 100 million subscribers.

Several public interest groups including Public Knowledge asked the FCC to block the deal, expressing concern over a a unique cross-marketing agreement between fierce rivals in the business of supplying wireline Internet connections into homes.

Verizon Wireless defended the deal, saying it needs more spectrum to bolster its networks.

“It will put spectrum to work to meet growing demand, and we believe the transfer is in line with goals in the FCC’s National Broadband Plan,” Verizon said in a statement.

Through the deal, Verizon Wireless and cable companies have begun to cross-promote each other’s services so that they can offer what is known as “quadruple plays” — bundles of landline phone, wireless, cable television and high-speed Internet connections to consumers.

That portion of the deal is being investigated by the Justice Department, which is also reviewing the deal, because of concern Verizon Communications may let its FiOs wireline television and Internet service atrophy.

The marketing arrangement “gives rise to serious concern that not only will these providers decline to compete further with one another, they will actively collude with one another," the public interest groups said in a joint filing.

The Communications Workers of America labor union told the FCC that it does not oppose the sale of spectrum to VerizonWireless because if feels unused airwaves should be quickly put to use to handle the capacity problems faced by consumers.

But it asked the FCC to ensure Verizon keep up its television and landline Internet service to areas it covers and to expand it to cover nearly the whole nation. Verizon Communications has said it won’t expand beyond its current footprint of about 14 million homes.

Related:

Justice probing Verizon, cable over marketing deal

Senate to take up Verizon, cable deal in hearing

Verizon strikes spectrum, marketing deal with cable firms

By  |  11:29 AM ET, 02/22/2012

 
Read what others are saying
     

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company