Most Read: Business

 Last Update: : AM 04/19/2015(NASDAQ&DJIA)

World Markets from      


Other Market Data from      


Key Rates from      


Blog Contributors

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee covers technology policy, including copyright and patent law, telecom regulation, privacy, and free speech. He also writes about the economics of technology. He has previously written for Ars Technica and Forbes. You can follow him on Twitter or send him email.

Brian Fung

Brian Fung

Brian Fung covers technology for The Washington Post, focusing on electronic privacy, national security, digital politics and the Internet that binds it all together. He was previously the technology correspondent for National Journal and an associate editor at the Atlantic. His writing has also appeared in Foreign Policy, Talking Points Memo, the American Prospect and Nonprofit Quarterly. Follow Brian on Google+ .

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson covers technology policy for The Washington Post, with an emphasis on cybersecurity, consumer privacy, transparency, surveillance and open government. She also delves into the societal impacts of technology access and how innovation is intertwined with cultural development.

Post Tech
About / Where's Post I.T.?   |    Twitter  |   On Facebook  |  RSS RSS Feed  |  E-Mail Cecilia
Posted at 10:20 AM ET, 06/14/2012

DOJ video probe highlights more telecom, cable deals ahead

(Gene J. Puskar - Associated Press)
A key part of the Justice Department’s investigation into competition in the online video space is what kinds of content cable Internet service providers decide to count against monthly caps and what they do not.

Here is our story on Justice’s investigation in Thursday’s paper.

Known by many terms — most favored nation agreements or managed services — cable and telecom firms are expected to roll out a dizzying array of these options for consumers that do not count against data caps.

Indeed, AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson telegraphed more of these options to come.

“Customers are beginning to understand that as you use more, you pay for more,” Stephenson said last month at the Sanford C. Bernstein investors conference in New York. “If the customer is now apprehensive, you can envision where that content provider may want to come to a carrier and say, look, we’d like to engage in a model where ... the customers isn’t willing to pay, but we are willing to pay for it.”

Translation: ABC paying AT&T for a free channel for consumers on mobile devices?

Such options pose new competitive concerns for Silicon Valley Web firms, who will find themselves competing against streaming video services offered by cable and media firms at much more attractive prices, analysts say.

“Media and telecommunications giants, which can be one and the same, should not be able to take advantage of their size and reach to eliminate competition and to harm consumers through data caps which favor some content over other based on business relationships, through contract terms that could restrict where programming can be shown, or other means,” said Harold Feld, a vice president at public interest group Public Knowledge.

Such practices have angered Netflix, which says Comcast’s streaming XFinity service for the XBox gaming console doesn’t count against data caps so it makes it harder for Netflix to compete.

That practice is being reviewed, according to several people familiar with Justice’s investigation. Comcast has said its free XFinity XBox service isn’t anticompetition. It is for its cable customers and that those videos don’t ride over the public Internet in the same way Netflix’s videos do.


Justice Department sues Apple, publishers over e-books

Verizon to offer free texts and voice services, boosts data prices

By  |  10:20 AM ET, 06/14/2012

Read what others are saying

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company