Most Read: Business

 Last Update: : AM 04/01/2015(NASDAQ&DJIA) |

World Markets from      


Other Market Data from      


Key Rates from      


Blog Contributors

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee covers technology policy, including copyright and patent law, telecom regulation, privacy, and free speech. He also writes about the economics of technology. He has previously written for Ars Technica and Forbes. You can follow him on Twitter or send him email.

Brian Fung

Brian Fung

Brian Fung covers technology for The Washington Post, focusing on electronic privacy, national security, digital politics and the Internet that binds it all together. He was previously the technology correspondent for National Journal and an associate editor at the Atlantic. His writing has also appeared in Foreign Policy, Talking Points Memo, the American Prospect and Nonprofit Quarterly. Follow Brian on Google+ .

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson covers technology policy for The Washington Post, with an emphasis on cybersecurity, consumer privacy, transparency, surveillance and open government. She also delves into the societal impacts of technology access and how innovation is intertwined with cultural development.

Post Tech
About / Where's Post I.T.?   |    Twitter  |   On Facebook  |  RSS RSS Feed  |  E-Mail Cecilia
Posted at 11:53 AM ET, 12/02/2011

FCC applauds BART’s actions to protect cellphone use in stations

Federal Communications Chariman Julius Genachowski applauded the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) board of directors decision to codify when it was appropriate to block cellphone use in its stations.

The board, which drew criticism over summer when it decided to block cellphone signals to avoid a potential protest, ruled that it would turn off wireless communications only in the face of a “extraordinary circumstances.”

Such circumstances include evidence that cellphones are being used as “instrumentalities in explosives,”,to facilitate criminal activity such as the taking of hostages, or to facilitate plans that would destroy property or “substantially disrupt public transit services.”

In those circumstances, the board decided, it could institute a “narrowly tailored interruption of service.”

Genachowski said that BART had taken an “important step” in responding to the concerns raised by its actions over the summer but that the FCC will be reviewing the issue of when it’s appropriate to disrupt cell service.

“For interruption of communications service to be permissible or advisable, it must clear a high substantive and procedural bar,” he said.

By  |  11:53 AM ET, 12/02/2011

Tags:  FCC

Read what others are saying

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company