Most Read: Business

 Last Update: : AM 04/25/2015(NASDAQ&DJIA)

World Markets from      


Other Market Data from      


Key Rates from      


Blog Contributors

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee covers technology policy, including copyright and patent law, telecom regulation, privacy, and free speech. He also writes about the economics of technology. He has previously written for Ars Technica and Forbes. You can follow him on Twitter or send him email.

Brian Fung

Brian Fung

Brian Fung covers technology for The Washington Post, focusing on electronic privacy, national security, digital politics and the Internet that binds it all together. He was previously the technology correspondent for National Journal and an associate editor at the Atlantic. His writing has also appeared in Foreign Policy, Talking Points Memo, the American Prospect and Nonprofit Quarterly. Follow Brian on Google+ .

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson covers technology policy for The Washington Post, with an emphasis on cybersecurity, consumer privacy, transparency, surveillance and open government. She also delves into the societal impacts of technology access and how innovation is intertwined with cultural development.

Post Tech
About / Where's Post I.T.?   |    Twitter  |   On Facebook  |  RSS RSS Feed  |  E-Mail Cecilia
Posted at 03:23 PM ET, 08/22/2011

FCC removes Fairness Doctrine from the books

FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski. (Mark Wilson - GETTY IMAGES)
The Federal Communications Commission said Monday it has abolished a controversial speech rule known as the “Fairness Doctrine” requiring broadcasters to present opposing views of controversial issues.

The regulation, which hasn’t been enforced in two decades, has been criticized for years as an over-reach of media industry speech rights.

FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski said he opposed the rules, which he said were unnecessary. He said he removed the regulation from the FCC, along with dozens of other rules he described as outdated and a regulatory slog for the media and communications industries.

“The elimination of the obsolete Fairness Doctrine regulations will remove an unnecessary distraction,” Genachowski said in a statement.

The so-called Fairness Doctrine, first implemented in 1949 during a time when local broadcast markets had little competition and regulators hoped to promote differing political points of views.

The doctrine was abandoned in the late 1980s, but was never technically removed from the books. That has periodically concerned some media groups, particularly conservative groups that feared talk shows would be required to present equal time to opposing views.

Genachowski said the doctrine instead “ holds the potential to chill free speech and the free flow of ideas and was properly abandoned over two decades ago.”

By  |  03:23 PM ET, 08/22/2011

Read what others are saying

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company