Most Read: Business

 Last Update: : AM 04/28/2015(NASDAQ&DJIA)

World Markets from      


Other Market Data from      


Key Rates from      


Blog Contributors

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee covers technology policy, including copyright and patent law, telecom regulation, privacy, and free speech. He also writes about the economics of technology. He has previously written for Ars Technica and Forbes. You can follow him on Twitter or send him email.

Brian Fung

Brian Fung

Brian Fung covers technology for The Washington Post, focusing on electronic privacy, national security, digital politics and the Internet that binds it all together. He was previously the technology correspondent for National Journal and an associate editor at the Atlantic. His writing has also appeared in Foreign Policy, Talking Points Memo, the American Prospect and Nonprofit Quarterly. Follow Brian on Google+ .

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson covers technology policy for The Washington Post, with an emphasis on cybersecurity, consumer privacy, transparency, surveillance and open government. She also delves into the societal impacts of technology access and how innovation is intertwined with cultural development.

Post Tech
About / Where's Post I.T.?   |    Twitter  |   On Facebook  |  RSS RSS Feed  |  E-Mail Cecilia
Posted at 02:35 PM ET, 06/27/2011

FTC member: Do not track should apply to mobile apps

Federal Trade Commission member Julie Brill on Monday reiterated a push for stronger Internet privacy policies, including a controversial “do not track” requirement for all Web sites to adopt.

Brill, who spoke at a panel at the American Center for Progress on proposed anti-tracking mechanism, said such a mechanism should extend to Internet access on mobile devices. Consumers, she said, should be able to block Web sites and marketers from following them on smartphones and tablets, where they are spending more of their online time.

“Consumers should not be expected to make tracking choices on a company-by-company basis,” Brill said in a keynote speech. “This raises the issue ... of whether Do Not Track should be extended to the mobile environment. With so much information about consumers exchanged in that space, I believe the answer is yes.”

Brill cited a Future of Privacy Forum report that found that of the top 30 paid apps, 22 didn’t have a basic privacy policy.

She said the Web industry hasn’t done a good enough job to inform users clearly and simply when data about them is being collected. And while the FTC has stepped up enforcement of privacy violations, those actions come after potential harms are made and consumers need better preventative measures to protect them.

“It is not reasonable to expect consumers to read and understand privacy policies – most about as long and as clear as the Code of Hammurabi – especially when all that stands between them and buying a new flat-screen TV, or playing the latest version of Angry Birds, is clicking the little box that says I consent,” Brill said.

She is scheduled to testify at a Senate Commerce Committee hearing this Wednesday on Internet privacy and security.

Microsoft and Firefox have created “do not track” technologies in their browsers that allow users to block Web sites and marketers from following their activity on the Internet.

The FTC has proposed a Do Not Track requirement with the following provisions:

- It must be simple and easy to use

- Companies that don’t honor a consumer choice not to be tracked would face enforcement action

- A Do Not Track mechanism must apply across companies and technologies.

- Beyond blocking behavioral ads, a user should be able to stop the collection of information about her online behavior.

- Consumers who choose not to be tracked should not have to reset that preference every time a cookie appears, or every time they close their browser.


Consumer groups urge investigation into Facebook's facial recognition tool

Franken, Blumenthal introduce mobile privacy bill

Facebook hires former White House spokesman

By  |  02:35 PM ET, 06/27/2011

Read what others are saying

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company