Most Read: Business

DJIA
-0.08%
S&P 500
0.03%
NASDAQ
0.30%
 Last Update: 10:32 AM 09/02/2014

World Markets from      

 

Other Market Data from      

 

Key Rates from      

 

Blog Contributors

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee covers technology policy, including copyright and patent law, telecom regulation, privacy, and free speech. He also writes about the economics of technology. He has previously written for Ars Technica and Forbes. You can follow him on Twitter or send him email.

Brian Fung

Brian Fung

Brian Fung covers technology for The Washington Post, focusing on electronic privacy, national security, digital politics and the Internet that binds it all together. He was previously the technology correspondent for National Journal and an associate editor at the Atlantic. His writing has also appeared in Foreign Policy, Talking Points Memo, the American Prospect and Nonprofit Quarterly. Follow Brian on Google+ .

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson covers technology policy for The Washington Post, with an emphasis on cybersecurity, consumer privacy, transparency, surveillance and open government. She also delves into the societal impacts of technology access and how innovation is intertwined with cultural development.

Post Tech
About / Where's Post I.T.?   |    Twitter  |   On Facebook  |  RSS RSS Feed  |  E-Mail Cecilia
Posted at 02:23 PM ET, 07/19/2011

Google Books judge urges deal as dispute drags on


Google has been given until Sept. 15 to reach a deal with authors and publishers over Google Books. (Mark Lennihan - AP)
Google and book authors and publishers have until Sept. 15 to reach a settlement over digital rights, a federal judge said Tuesday, before he will instruct both sides to prepare for a trial.

Reuters reported that U.S. District Judge Denny Chin told both parties in a Tuesday hearing that he was frustrated that they had not reached an acceptable settlement in the six-year-old case.

According to the Reuters report, authors and publishers are seeking an “opt-in” model that includes the work of those who agree to have their material included in the digital library, rather than the “opt-out” model, which requires those who don’t want their material request to have their work removed.

Chin rejected a settlement this past March, saying that it went “too far” in granting Google an advantage over copyright holders and its competitors.

In March, the Justice Department said that the court had reached the right result on the rejected settlement. “We are pleased that the court supported our position,” Gina Talamona, a spokeswoman for the Justice Department, told The Post.

By  |  02:23 PM ET, 07/19/2011

Tags:  Google, IP

 
Read what others are saying
     

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company