wpostServer: http://css.washingtonpost.com/wpost2

Most Read: Business

DJIA
-0.72%
S&P 500
-0.51%
NASDAQ
-0.56%
 Last Update: 12:14 PM 07/25/2014

World Markets from      

 

Other Market Data from      

 

Key Rates from      

 

Blog Contributors

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee covers technology policy, including copyright and patent law, telecom regulation, privacy, and free speech. He also writes about the economics of technology. He has previously written for Ars Technica and Forbes. You can follow him on Twitter or send him email.

Brian Fung

Brian Fung

Brian Fung covers technology for The Washington Post, focusing on electronic privacy, national security, digital politics and the Internet that binds it all together. He was previously the technology correspondent for National Journal and an associate editor at the Atlantic. His writing has also appeared in Foreign Policy, Talking Points Memo, the American Prospect and Nonprofit Quarterly. Follow Brian on Google+ .

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson covers technology policy for The Washington Post, with an emphasis on cybersecurity, consumer privacy, transparency, surveillance and open government. She also delves into the societal impacts of technology access and how innovation is intertwined with cultural development.

Post Tech
About / Where's Post I.T.?   |    Twitter  |   On Facebook  |  RSS RSS Feed  |  E-Mail Cecilia
Posted at 10:23 AM ET, 02/21/2012

Pressure on Google over privacy problems mounts


(BRENDAN MCDERMID - REUTERS)
Pressure against Google is mounting over the company’s questionable privacy practices.

The Electronic Privacy Information Center on Tuesday pursued its lawsuit against the Federal Trade Commission — a move aimed at getting the agency to fine Google over a new policy that advocates say would violate user privacy.

EPIC said that recent revelations that Google may have purposefully worked around the privacy settings of Apple’s Safari browser show the firm needs to be punished for its behavior.

“The Safari hack provides more evidence that Google should be barred from making the proposed changes on March 1,” said Mark Rotenberg, executive director of EPIC. On March 1, Google plans to combine data from users’ Gmail across its 60 services to be used for behavioral advertising. Account holders to Google’s services cannot opt out of the new system.

Microsoft’s Internet Explorer engineers said Monday that Google could be also bypassing privacy settings on its browser, which Google denies.

The FTC on Friday asked the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia to dismiss EPIC’s suit, saying it was without merit. EPIC wants the court to order the FTC to enforce penalties for alleged violations of Google’s June 2011 privacy settlement with the agency.

Despite its reaction to the lawsuit, the FTC may already be investigating Google on violations of its settlement. The penalties could be astronomical — up to $16,000 per day of violation. The FTC could also take into account how many people have signed up for the company’s service (350 million Gmail users) in reaching a settlement over fines.

Google has defended its practices, saying it has clearly informed users of its March 1 changes.

The company faces a separate lawsuit in a Delaware federal court on the alleged Safari browser violation. The company has declined to comment on the lawsuit.

Related:

Google plans sweeping privacy changes March 1

A closer look at Google's response to Safari accusations

By  |  10:23 AM ET, 02/21/2012

 
Read what others are saying
     

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company