Last Update: : AM 03/29/2015(NASDAQ&DJIA) |

World Markets from      


Other Market Data from      


Key Rates from      


Blog Contributors

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee covers technology policy, including copyright and patent law, telecom regulation, privacy, and free speech. He also writes about the economics of technology. He has previously written for Ars Technica and Forbes. You can follow him on Twitter or send him email.

Brian Fung

Brian Fung

Brian Fung covers technology for The Washington Post, focusing on electronic privacy, national security, digital politics and the Internet that binds it all together. He was previously the technology correspondent for National Journal and an associate editor at the Atlantic. His writing has also appeared in Foreign Policy, Talking Points Memo, the American Prospect and Nonprofit Quarterly. Follow Brian on Google+ .

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson covers technology policy for The Washington Post, with an emphasis on cybersecurity, consumer privacy, transparency, surveillance and open government. She also delves into the societal impacts of technology access and how innovation is intertwined with cultural development.

The Post Most: BusinessMost-viewed stories, videos and galleries int he past two hours

Post Tech
About / Where's Post I.T.?   |    Twitter  |   On Facebook  |  RSS RSS Feed  |  E-Mail Cecilia
Posted at 04:54 PM ET, 05/20/2011

Reel Grrls turns down Comcast funds, cites free expression

Reel Grrls, the Seattle nonprofit that nearly lost its summer camp funding from Comcast because of an unflattering tweet, has decided not to accept money from the cable giant.

In a statement Friday, executive director Malory Graham said Comcast’s decision to take away funds and then to restore them after media attention raised too many concerns.

On Thursday, Comcast apologized for the actions of a local executive in Washington State, who told Reel Grrls a critical tweet of the company cost the nonprofit its sponsorship for a summer camp that teaches teenage girls about filmmaking.

Comcast said the decision wasn’t authorized by corporate headquarters and that it wanted to restore the $18,000 in funding for the program it has sponsored for three years.

As a recap, Reel Grrls offended Comcast with a tweet that questioned the hiring of a sitting Federal Communications Commission member, Meredith Attwell Baker. The company has received criticism from public interest groups, editorials and late night comedians about hiring Baker just four months after she voted in favor of Comcast’s massive venture with NBC Universal.

Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), chairman of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, sent a letter to FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski this week asking for more information about Baker’s move to Comcast and if her vote for the NBC Universal merger was a conflict of interest.

The episode and ensuing public relations headache raised questions by public interest groups and readers on social media sites who decried Comcast’s actions as an indication that the company has used its power to stifle free expression.

“Given the serious questions Comcast’s initial decision to take punitive measures on our organization raised about the ability of corporations to stifle public discussion, we have decided to redesign our summer camp to focus on developing films about free press issues,” Graham said in a statement on Friday.

She said Reel Grrls will look for other ways to finance the summer camp. The episode highlighted the need for greater scrutiny of media consolidation, she said..

“Unfortunately, it is exactly this type of public debate that can be squelched by mergers that threaten to raise the price for access to information, limit consumers’ choices in entertainment and news and give large media corporations the power to decide which opinions will see the light of day,” she said.

Comcast spokeswoman Sena Fitzmaurice said:

“We sincerely regret the actions of this one unauthorized employee which does not represent how our company treats our community partners. While we planned to continue their funding, we will respect their decision.”

By  |  04:54 PM ET, 05/20/2011

Read what others are saying

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company