Most Read: Business

DJIA
1.31%
S&P 500
1.96%
NASDAQ
2.40%
 Last Update: 12:23 AM 10/22/2014

World Markets from      

 

Other Market Data from      

 

Key Rates from      

 

Blog Contributors

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee covers technology policy, including copyright and patent law, telecom regulation, privacy, and free speech. He also writes about the economics of technology. He has previously written for Ars Technica and Forbes. You can follow him on Twitter or send him email.

Brian Fung

Brian Fung

Brian Fung covers technology for The Washington Post, focusing on electronic privacy, national security, digital politics and the Internet that binds it all together. He was previously the technology correspondent for National Journal and an associate editor at the Atlantic. His writing has also appeared in Foreign Policy, Talking Points Memo, the American Prospect and Nonprofit Quarterly. Follow Brian on Google+ .

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson covers technology policy for The Washington Post, with an emphasis on cybersecurity, consumer privacy, transparency, surveillance and open government. She also delves into the societal impacts of technology access and how innovation is intertwined with cultural development.

Post Tech
About / Where's Post I.T.?   |    Twitter  |   On Facebook  |  RSS RSS Feed  |  E-Mail Cecilia
Posted at 09:43 AM ET, 06/04/2012

Report: Facebook planning to build access for users younger than 13


(Scott Eells - BLOOMBERG)
This post has been updated.

Facebook may be planning to build technology that would allow children under 13 to register for the site and give their parents some control over how their kids may use it.

It’s not yet clear whether Facebook would put an under-13 network out there, as first reported in the Wall Street Journal. The Journal noted that Facebook often works to develop technology that it does not release to the public.

In compliance with the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act, Facebook does not allow anyone under 13 to have a Facebook account — a rule that children and their parents regularly circumvent by posting false dates of birth.

In a statement, Facebook said, that it has been working to address the problem of children’s online safety and privacy.

“Many recent reports have highlighted just how difficult it is to enforce age restrictions on the Internet, especially when parents want their children to access online content and services,” the company said. “We are in continuous dialogue with stakeholders, regulators and other policymakers about how best to help parents keep their kids safe in an evolving online environment.”

A person familiar with the situation said that the company is looking into the issue, but has not made any decisions about how to proceed.

Facebook co-founder and chief executive Mark Zuckerberg has said in the past that he would like to have a broader conversation about including children younger than 13 on Facebook, once there was a way to assure that they would be safe online.

Zuckerberg has said that he sees a lot of potential for education and collaboration between students using Facebook tools, a model the company has already implemented for college students.

Adding tools for younger students would also give the network a new demographic target and would allow it to partner with companies and organizations that market to children, the report noted. “The under-13 features could enable Facebook and its partners to charge parents for games and other entertainment accessed by their children, the people said.”

That idea has drawn criticism from groups such as Common Sense Media, whose chief executive officer, James Steyer, said Facebook “appears to be doing whatever it takes to identify new revenue streams and short-term corporate profits to impress spooked shareholders.”

Steyer said he does not believe there is any “meaningful social or educational value of Facebook for children under 13” and that he has serious concerns with privacy and development about opening the network to preteens.

By  |  09:43 AM ET, 06/04/2012

 
Read what others are saying
     

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company