Most Read: Business

 Last Update: : AM 04/25/2015(NASDAQ&DJIA)

World Markets from      


Other Market Data from      


Key Rates from      


Blog Contributors

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee covers technology policy, including copyright and patent law, telecom regulation, privacy, and free speech. He also writes about the economics of technology. He has previously written for Ars Technica and Forbes. You can follow him on Twitter or send him email.

Brian Fung

Brian Fung

Brian Fung covers technology for The Washington Post, focusing on electronic privacy, national security, digital politics and the Internet that binds it all together. He was previously the technology correspondent for National Journal and an associate editor at the Atlantic. His writing has also appeared in Foreign Policy, Talking Points Memo, the American Prospect and Nonprofit Quarterly. Follow Brian on Google+ .

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson covers technology policy for The Washington Post, with an emphasis on cybersecurity, consumer privacy, transparency, surveillance and open government. She also delves into the societal impacts of technology access and how innovation is intertwined with cultural development.

Post Tech
About / Where's Post I.T.?   |    Twitter  |   On Facebook  |  RSS RSS Feed  |  E-Mail Cecilia
Posted at 04:52 PM ET, 03/08/2011

Republicans pan FCC reasons for net neutrality rules

A day before House lawmakers put controversial net neutrality rules under scrutiny, leading Republican lawmakers said the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission hasn’t convinced them that the reasons behind the rules were good enough.

In a statement, House Energy and Commerce Committee chairman Fred Upton (R-Mich.) and Communications and Technology Subcommittee leaders Greg Walden (R-Ore.) and Lee Terry (R-Neb.) said an economic analysis provided by the FCC for its Internet access rules “failed to provide a compelling justification for its power-grab.”

The FCC implemented in December first-time Internet access rules that prevent cable and telecom operators from blocking or arbitrarily slowing traffic on their networks. Republican and some Democratic lawmakers have called the move an overstep for an agency that has debatable authority to regulate broadband services.

Wednesday’s hearing by the Communications and Technology Subcommittee will be the second in the House, where Republican leaders are seeking to hobble the rules. Lawmakers have introduced two bills — one that would overturn the rules and one that would withhold appropriations for the agency — and this hearing will focus on the former. Both bills would have to pass a House and a Senate vote and be signed by President Obama to become law.

FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski said in a letter to the lawmakers that the lack of competition in the market for broadband service providers justifies regulations that ensure equal access to content. The agency said in its order that the rules were created “because broadband providers have the ability to act as gatekeepers even in the absence of market power with respect to end users.”

It said Internet applications such as Amazon, eBay and Google had characterized Internet access rules as “a critical component of [their] contribution to economic growth.”

Upton, Walden and Terry said in their statement Tuesday that the analysis provided by Genachowski “does little more than summarize the comments of parties and provide conclusory statements.”

Analysts said the hearing Wednesday, which will not include FCC members, will probably not lead to termination of FCC net neutrality rules.

Jeffrey Silva, a telecommunications and media analyst with Medley Global Advisors, said holding the hearing carries political benefits for Republican lawmakers.

“It doesn't hurt to say to the Tea Party members, ‘Look we are really with you on this.’ ” Silva said. “That’s an important thing ahead of elections.”


House lawmakers face uphill battle on overturning net neutrality

By  |  04:52 PM ET, 03/08/2011

Read what others are saying

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company