Most Read: Business

 Last Update: 3:26 PM 05/06/2015(NASDAQ&DJIA)

World Markets from      


Other Market Data from      


Key Rates from      


Blog Contributors

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee covers technology policy, including copyright and patent law, telecom regulation, privacy, and free speech. He also writes about the economics of technology. He has previously written for Ars Technica and Forbes. You can follow him on Twitter or send him email.

Brian Fung

Brian Fung

Brian Fung covers technology for The Washington Post, focusing on electronic privacy, national security, digital politics and the Internet that binds it all together. He was previously the technology correspondent for National Journal and an associate editor at the Atlantic. His writing has also appeared in Foreign Policy, Talking Points Memo, the American Prospect and Nonprofit Quarterly. Follow Brian on Google+ .

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson covers technology policy for The Washington Post, with an emphasis on cybersecurity, consumer privacy, transparency, surveillance and open government. She also delves into the societal impacts of technology access and how innovation is intertwined with cultural development.

Post Tech
About / Where's Post I.T.?   |    Twitter  |   On Facebook  |  RSS RSS Feed  |  E-Mail Cecilia
Posted at 04:44 PM ET, 11/21/2011

SOPA goes for House debate Dec. 15

The House Judiciary Committee chairman plans to move a hotly debated anti-piracy and counterfeiting bill for markup on Dec. 15, according to a Hill aide.
Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Tex.) (Drew Angerer - AP)

Lawmakers will then debate changes over Rep. Lamar Smith’s (R-Tex.) Stop Online Piracy Act, a legislation that has pitted media companies against high-tech firms such as Google and Facebook.

A Judiciary Committee aide said Smith is “open to changes” in the bill and is in discussions with a wide range of parties who would be affected by new laws.

“He is open to changes but only legitimate changes,” the Hill aide said, speaking on condition of anonymity because the legislation is still being debated. “Some site are totally capable of filtering illegal content, but they won’t and are instead profiting from the traffic of illegal content.”

SOPA, with 25 co-sponsors from both parties, would give law enforcement the ability to seize Web sites that are primarily dedicated to the distribution of illegal piracy or counterfeiting. It would also require Web sites and telecom service providers to monitor their networks for pirated material, critics say.

Media companies including Hollywood studios, argue that without strong laws to stop piracy, they will continue a losing battle against content theft online.

“The bill provides effective due process to the parties involved.  A federal judge must first agree that the website in question is dedicated to illegal and infringing activity,” Smith said recently in a statement. “Only then will a court order be issued directing companies to sever ties with the illegal website. Legitimate websites have nothing to worry about under this bill.”

But network architecture firms and some free speech proponents argue the legislation could disrupt the domain name system of Web sites and could curb rights of expression on the Internet.

By  |  04:44 PM ET, 11/21/2011

Read what others are saying

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company