Most Read: Business

DJIA
0.11%
S&P 500
0.33%
NASDAQ
0.50%
 Last Update: 12:11 PM 08/30/2014

World Markets from      

 

Other Market Data from      

 

Key Rates from      

 

Blog Contributors

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee covers technology policy, including copyright and patent law, telecom regulation, privacy, and free speech. He also writes about the economics of technology. He has previously written for Ars Technica and Forbes. You can follow him on Twitter or send him email.

Brian Fung

Brian Fung

Brian Fung covers technology for The Washington Post, focusing on electronic privacy, national security, digital politics and the Internet that binds it all together. He was previously the technology correspondent for National Journal and an associate editor at the Atlantic. His writing has also appeared in Foreign Policy, Talking Points Memo, the American Prospect and Nonprofit Quarterly. Follow Brian on Google+ .

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson covers technology policy for The Washington Post, with an emphasis on cybersecurity, consumer privacy, transparency, surveillance and open government. She also delves into the societal impacts of technology access and how innovation is intertwined with cultural development.

Post Tech
About / Where's Post I.T.?   |    Twitter  |   On Facebook  |  RSS RSS Feed  |  E-Mail Cecilia
Posted at 04:18 PM ET, 08/19/2011

Sprint filing raises new challenges to AT&T, T-Mobile merger


(TONY DEJAK/ASSOCIATED PRESS)
Sprint raised new questions about AT&T and T-Mobile’s merger in a Thursday filing, saying that the economic model the companies submitted to the agency came too late and in such a piecemeal fashion that it has not given opponents a fair chance to react.

The FCC said July 21 that AT&T indicated that it now relies on new models to support the approval of its merger, and stopped the “shot clock” on its review of the merger.

In the Thursday filing, Sprint representatives told FCC officials that the series of later filings about these new models “make it difficult for Sprint and other interested parties to offer timely and meaningful comments.”

“The Applicants [AT&T and T-Mobile] should not be allowed to get a ‘second bite at the apple’ (let alone a third or more bites) after failing in the Applications and Opposition to establish that the proposed transaction will promote the public interest,” Sprint said in the document.

In response to the filing, Jim Cicconi, AT&T’s senior executive vice president of external and legislative affairs said in a statement that the company’s filings on the model “confirms the compelling evidence previously submitted as to why our merger should be approved.” Cicconi added that it “doesn’t surprise us one bit that Sprint would argue that it be ignored” and that its arguments are a “sign of desperation.”

By  |  04:18 PM ET, 08/19/2011

Tags:  Sprint, AT&T, T-Mobile, FCC

 
Read what others are saying
     

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company