wpostServer: http://css.washingtonpost.com/wpost

The Post Most: Business

DJIA
-0.10%
S&P 500
0.14%
NASDAQ
0.23%
 Last Update: 02:12 PM 04/19/2014

World Markets from      

 

Other Market Data from      

 

Key Rates from      

 

Blog Contributors

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee covers technology policy, including copyright and patent law, telecom regulation, privacy, and free speech. He also writes about the economics of technology. He has previously written for Ars Technica and Forbes. You can follow him on Twitter or send him email.

Brian Fung

Brian Fung

Brian Fung covers technology for The Washington Post, focusing on electronic privacy, national security, digital politics and the Internet that binds it all together. He was previously the technology correspondent for National Journal and an associate editor at the Atlantic. His writing has also appeared in Foreign Policy, Talking Points Memo, the American Prospect and Nonprofit Quarterly. Follow Brian on Google+ .

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson covers technology policy for The Washington Post, with an emphasis on cybersecurity, consumer privacy, transparency, surveillance and open government. She also delves into the societal impacts of technology access and how innovation is intertwined with cultural development.

Post Tech
About / Where's Post I.T.?   |    Twitter  |   On Facebook  |  RSS RSS Feed  |  E-Mail Cecilia
Posted at 05:12 PM ET, 03/28/2011

Sprint vows to fight AT&T/T-Mobile merger

AT&T hasn’t filed for approval for its proposed merger with T-Mobile yet, but the lobbying fight has already begun. So far, we’ve heard from the company that stands to lose the most if the deal goes through— Sprint — and from its far larger rival.

Sprint made an official statement Tuesday opposing the plan. The press release echoed the sentiments of Sprint chief executive Dan Hesse’s comments last week at the CTIA Wireless conference in Orlando.

In the statement, Sprint’s senior vice president of government affairs, Vonya McCann, urged the federal government not to approve the merger. A merger would entrench a mobile duopoly between AT&T and Verizon, she said, and the new company would be three times the size of Sprint, its nearest national competitor.

“Sprint will fight this attempt by AT&T to undo the progress of the past 25 years and create a new Ma Bell duopoly,” McCann said.

AT&T issued the following response, which recaps many of its arguments for the merger:

“The U.S. wireless market is intensely competitive with five or more competitors in 18 of the top 20 markets.  The AT&T  T-Mobile merger will improve quality for consumers, provide a near-term solution to spectrum exhaust, and expand the availability of LTE to 95% of Americans, spurring innovation and economic growth.”

When AT&T merged with SBC, it filed its merger approval paperwork three weeks after announcing the deal.

Related stories:

In pursuit of T-Mobile, AT&T has fierce lobbying clout

Sprint CEO says AT&T, T-Mobile merger would ‘stifle innovation’

Analysts weigh in on Sprint, T-Mobile merger

By  |  05:12 PM ET, 03/28/2011

Tags:  AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, FCC, DOJ

 
Read what others are saying
     

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company