Most Read: Business

DJIA
0.11%
S&P 500
0.33%
NASDAQ
0.50%
 Last Update: 08:41 AM 09/02/2014

World Markets from      

 

Other Market Data from      

 

Key Rates from      

 

Blog Contributors

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee covers technology policy, including copyright and patent law, telecom regulation, privacy, and free speech. He also writes about the economics of technology. He has previously written for Ars Technica and Forbes. You can follow him on Twitter or send him email.

Brian Fung

Brian Fung

Brian Fung covers technology for The Washington Post, focusing on electronic privacy, national security, digital politics and the Internet that binds it all together. He was previously the technology correspondent for National Journal and an associate editor at the Atlantic. His writing has also appeared in Foreign Policy, Talking Points Memo, the American Prospect and Nonprofit Quarterly. Follow Brian on Google+ .

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson covers technology policy for The Washington Post, with an emphasis on cybersecurity, consumer privacy, transparency, surveillance and open government. She also delves into the societal impacts of technology access and how innovation is intertwined with cultural development.

Post Tech
About / Where's Post I.T.?   |    Twitter  |   On Facebook  |  RSS RSS Feed  |  E-Mail Cecilia
Posted at 03:38 PM ET, 02/22/2012

State attorneys general: Google privacy changes appear to harm consumers


Google co-founder Larry Page at a news conference June 12, 2007. (Paul Sakuma - Associated Press)
Dozens of state attorneys general on Wednesday wrote Google’s chief executive to express “strong concerns” that the company’s new privacy policies starting next week will violate consumer privacy.

In a letter to CEO Larry Page, the state attorneys general said the plan to begin sharing consumer data across Google’s services on March 1 “forces these consumers to allow information across all of these products to be shared, without giving them the proper ability to opt out.”

The law enforcement officials said users may want to keep their Web searching history separate from information they get from Gmail or YouTube. But for users signed on to those services, that data will be blended by the search giant to serve up ads better tailored to users preferences.

Google has defended its plans, which have raised concerns among European regulators and privacy groups.

“We’ve undertaken the most extensive notification effort in Google’s history, and we’re continuing to offer choice and control over how people use our services,” Google said in a statement. “Of course we are happy to discuss this approach with regulators globally.”

The company says a user can still search or watch videos anonymously. But the state attorneys general questioned the options offered to users.

“It rings hollow to call their ability to exit the Google products ecosystem a ‘choice’ in an Internet economy where the clear majority of all Internet users use — and frequently rely on — at least one Google product on a regular basis,” the state attorneys general wrote to Page.

And they said the costs to switch e-mail and document applications could be enormous for businesses and government offices that use Google apps.

They requested a meeting with Page to explain the privacy policies and an answer to their letter by Feb. 29.

The letter was signed by, among others, Maryland attorney general Douglas Gansler, California’s Kamala Harris and New York’s Eric Schneiderman.

Related:

Google tracks user activities across products, no opt-out

Privacy problems pile up for Google

Android users most affected by Google privacy changes

By  |  03:38 PM ET, 02/22/2012

 
Read what others are saying
     

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company