Most Read: Business

 Last Update: : AM 04/19/2015(NASDAQ&DJIA)

World Markets from      


Other Market Data from      


Key Rates from      


Blog Contributors

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee covers technology policy, including copyright and patent law, telecom regulation, privacy, and free speech. He also writes about the economics of technology. He has previously written for Ars Technica and Forbes. You can follow him on Twitter or send him email.

Brian Fung

Brian Fung

Brian Fung covers technology for The Washington Post, focusing on electronic privacy, national security, digital politics and the Internet that binds it all together. He was previously the technology correspondent for National Journal and an associate editor at the Atlantic. His writing has also appeared in Foreign Policy, Talking Points Memo, the American Prospect and Nonprofit Quarterly. Follow Brian on Google+ .

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson covers technology policy for The Washington Post, with an emphasis on cybersecurity, consumer privacy, transparency, surveillance and open government. She also delves into the societal impacts of technology access and how innovation is intertwined with cultural development.

Post Tech
About / Where's Post I.T.?   |    Twitter  |   On Facebook  |  RSS RSS Feed  |  E-Mail Cecilia
Posted at 02:36 PM ET, 03/08/2012

The Circuit: Justice may sue Apple, publishers; Netflix mulls a cable channel?; China testing cyberattack capabilities

DOJ warns Apple, publishers about e-book suit: The Justice Department has told Apple and the nation’s biggest book publishers that it would sue them for their alleged price-fixing of electronic books unless the companies agree to change their business practices, The Washington Post reported.

Federal officials found that Apple, Simon and Schuster, Hachette Book Group, Penguin Group, Macmillan and HarperCollins have “engaged in a pattern of behavior that violates antitrust laws,” according to a person familiar with Justice’s investigation. At a December Congressional hearing on antitrust, Sharis Pozen, acting head of Justice’s antitrust division, said the agency was looking into the e-book industry.

Apple declined to comment on the case. Justice Department spokeswoman Gina Talamona confirmed that the e-books matter was open but declined to comment further.

Netflix planning a cable channel?: The New York Times reported that there may be something substantial to rumors that Netflix is mulling plans to launch its own cable channel, citing people “familiar with” Netflix’s meetings with major cable operators. A partnership between the rental service and cable providers would add the service’s subscription fees to cable subscribers’ monthly bills.

“We are more and more a classic cable network,” Netflix chief executive Reed Hastings said in a speech, according to the report. The newspaper said that Hastings added that a cable partnership would be, at some point, a “logical step.”

China cyber-attacks: The Washington Post reported that a commission set up by Congress has issued a report saying the Chinese military conducted an exercise in October involving “joint information offensive and defensive operations” and another in 2010 featuring attacks on communications command-and-control systems.

The report, prepared by Northrop Grumman, states that the United States lacks a policy to determine appropriate responses to a large-scale cyberattack on U.S. military or civilian networks in the event that the attacker’s identity cannot be conclusively determined. The report also states that Beijing may try to exploit that “gray area” in U.S. policy.

Proview: The embattled electronics maker Proview has threatened Apple vendors in China with “severe measures” if they sell the iPad, the Associated Press reported. Proview and Apple are embroiled in a legal fight over whether or not the Cupertino, Calif.-based tech giant legally purchased the “iPad” trademark from Proview ahead of the launch of its first-generation tablet.

In the letter, Proview warned vendors that any use of the iPad name would be an infringement of its rights to the name.

Universal Music: Critics have said that the proposed deal between Universal Music Group and EMI has the potential to stifle digital music innovation. In a statement, Universal Music Group said that it would continue to license its music in an effort to combat online piracy.

“We have every business reason to continue licensing our music to as many digital platforms as possible,” a Universal Music Group spokesman said in a statement. “The future of music depends on giving consumers ample legal alternatives to piracy, and that means embracing and empowering digital platforms.”

On Wednesday, Public Knowledge and Media Access Group sent a letter to Federal Trade Commission asking the agency to evaluate the proposed deal, saying it puts the music industry under the control of two companies, UMG and Sony.

By  |  02:36 PM ET, 03/08/2012

Read what others are saying

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company