Most Read: Business

 Last Update: 4:15 PM 04/17/2015(NASDAQ&DJIA)

World Markets from      


Other Market Data from      


Key Rates from      


Blog Contributors

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee covers technology policy, including copyright and patent law, telecom regulation, privacy, and free speech. He also writes about the economics of technology. He has previously written for Ars Technica and Forbes. You can follow him on Twitter or send him email.

Brian Fung

Brian Fung

Brian Fung covers technology for The Washington Post, focusing on electronic privacy, national security, digital politics and the Internet that binds it all together. He was previously the technology correspondent for National Journal and an associate editor at the Atlantic. His writing has also appeared in Foreign Policy, Talking Points Memo, the American Prospect and Nonprofit Quarterly. Follow Brian on Google+ .

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson covers technology policy for The Washington Post, with an emphasis on cybersecurity, consumer privacy, transparency, surveillance and open government. She also delves into the societal impacts of technology access and how innovation is intertwined with cultural development.

Post Tech
About / Where's Post I.T.?   |    Twitter  |   On Facebook  |  RSS RSS Feed  |  E-Mail Cecilia
Posted at 08:25 AM ET, 04/06/2011

White House pushing ahead with airwaves auction plan

This story ran in the print edition of today’s paper:

The Obama administration will make an economic case Wednesday for moving ahead with a controversial auction of broadcast airwaves, even as some analysts argue that AT&T’s proposed merger with T-Mobile throws a wrench into the plan.

The administration’s goal to blanket the country with wireless high-speed Internet connections has been pitched as an economic opportunity to create high-tech jobs that also help the U.S. compete globally.

To carry out that goal, Obama said he hopes to raise $27.8 billion over the next decade from auctions of broadcast channels that would be converted into wireless networks to connect smart phones and tablets to the Internet.

At a White House meeting on the plan Wednesday, the administration will present a letter of support signed by more than 100 economists who say the auctions are the best way to create new mobile phone networks and would “increase social welfare.”

But the plan appears to face new challenges because of AT&T’s recent proposal to take over T-Mobile for $39 billion, experts say.

The merger could slow progress toward the administration’s goals and could “alter the current spectrum debate in Washington,” Rebecca Arbogast, an analyst at Stifel Nicolaus, said in a recent note. “If these two companies can satisfy much of their spectrum needs by joining forces, it would reduce some of the demand for new spectrum and possibly lower auction revenue estimates.”

The merger would reduce the number of major national carriers from four to three. The money from the auction is to be used to pay back the broadcasters who give up spectrum, to expand wireless connections to rural areas and to pay for an emergency public safety network.

An administration official who was not authorized to speak on the record dismissed the merger’s impact on Obama’s wireless agenda.

“Our focus is on enabling the access of spectrum to as many bidders as possible,” the official said. “We have to leave it to antitrust authorities to evaluate any mergers, but we believe the demand and appetite under any scenario is going to be considerable.”

AT&T said it wants to buy T-Mobile so that together, with 130 million subscribers and more spectrum, they can compete against Verizon Communications. It said it supports the president’s plan for auctions.

“The spectrum crisis is real and could impact investment and jobs if Congress doesn’t act quickly,” said Michael Balmoris, an AT&T spokesman.

Sen. John D. Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.) introduced a bill that lets the Federal Communications Commission conduct the auctions. But lawmakers also want to scrutinize the huge telecom deal. The Justice Department and FCC will review whether the merger would have anti-competitive effects or would harm the public’s interest. The reviews could take as long as 18 months, analysts project.

All the attention on the transaction will give Rockefeller’s bill and other legislation a 35 percent chance of passing this year, MF Global analyst Paul Gallant said in a recent research note.

The merger could be read by some in Congress as, ‘Do we need to pass controversial spectrum legislation when AT&T is saying the T-Mobile deal gives it access to more spectrum?’ ” Gallant said.

The plan had been criticized for its complexity. There are several steps to the auction process. An administration official estimated it could take at least three years before any radio waves are put on the block.

And broadcasters are lobbying lawmakers for legislation that protects their interests. They want to be ensured they aren’t forced to give up airwaves or move to junk channels on low-quality bands.

Ahead of the 2012 elections, their message may get more attention from legislators who rely on broadcast television for political ads, experts say.

“This letter and event at the White House makes me think right off the bat that they are worried they can’t get legislation through to pull this off,” said Jeffrey Silva, a senior technology policy director at Global Medley Advisors.

By  |  08:25 AM ET, 04/06/2011

Tags:  Spectrum, FCC

Read what others are saying

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company