<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Fix</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix</link>
	<description>by Chris Cillizza</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 21:02:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Why guns and abortion should worry Scott Brown in New Hampshire</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/03/14/why-guns-and-abortion-should-worry-scott-brown-in-new-hampshire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/03/14/why-guns-and-abortion-should-worry-scott-brown-in-new-hampshire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 21:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Sullivan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign 2014]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/?p=84268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Hampshire Republican Senate primary has a new front-runner: Scott Brown. But that doesn't mean Brown -- who is launching a Senate exploratory committee -- will clear the primary without any worries. And not for the reason you've probably read about most, which is that he recently moved from Massachusetts to New Hampshire, opening [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/03/14/why-guns-and-abortion-should-worry-scott-brown-in-new-hampshire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How &#8216;McConnelling&#8217; came to be the hottest thing on the political web</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/03/14/how-mcconnelling-came-to-be/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/03/14/how-mcconnelling-came-to-be/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 19:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jaime Fuller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#mcconnelling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/?p=84262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week, the campaign of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) released an ad with no words. Only Mitch McConnell's smiling face. The Internet responded in kind by inserting McConnell's face where it was meant to be. No, not in super PAC ads. At the end of '90s sitcom title sequences, obviously. A day [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/03/14/how-mcconnelling-came-to-be/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What happens if  Hillary Clinton doesn&#8217;t run for president? Chaos.</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/03/14/what-happens-if-hillary-clinton-doesnt-run-for-president-chaos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/03/14/what-happens-if-hillary-clinton-doesnt-run-for-president-chaos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 17:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Cillizza]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign 2016]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Line]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/?p=84242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conventional wisdom -- and even some unconventional wisdom -- dictates that Hillary Clinton is running for president in 2016. A universe of super PACs and other organizations has been built  -- and staffed by former Clinton operatives -- to prepare the way for Hillary 2016. (To understand how fully formed these efforts are, make sure [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/03/14/what-happens-if-hillary-clinton-doesnt-run-for-president-chaos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Scott Brown is the icing on the cake for Senate Republicans</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/03/14/why-scott-brown-is-the-icing-on-the-cake-for-senate-republicans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/03/14/why-scott-brown-is-the-icing-on-the-cake-for-senate-republicans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 16:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Sullivan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign 2014]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/?p=84203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After months of stoking will-he-or-won't-he speculation in New Hampshire, Republican Scott Brown plans to announce Friday that he will explore a bid for U.S. Senate. It's the latest in a series of positive developments for Senate Republicans, who have expanded the landscape of competitive races in recent months as credible candidates have joined -- or in [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/03/14/why-scott-brown-is-the-icing-on-the-cake-for-senate-republicans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BREAKING: Congress actually did its job this week</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/03/14/this-week-congress-actually-did-its-job/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/03/14/this-week-congress-actually-did-its-job/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 16:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed O'Keefe]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[113th Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/?p=84212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an era when most Americans have dismissed the House and Senate as do-nothing bodies, Congress actually did something this week. The legislation passed and sent to President Obama won’t name a new post office or help Washington avoid another fiscal deadline. It also won’t fix significant problems with the health-care law, immigration or the [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/03/14/this-week-congress-actually-did-its-job/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politicians: Masters of not-so-great expectations</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/03/14/politicians-masters-of-not-so-great-expectations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/03/14/politicians-masters-of-not-so-great-expectations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jaime Fuller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Fix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/?p=84187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The game changes and gaffes may grow wan and wane, but the lowered expectations, those will be with us until the end of time. When a company is facing low profits, they lower expectations to match. When politicians don't think they're likely to complete their agenda, they lower expectations. But lowered expectations are perhaps the [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/03/14/politicians-masters-of-not-so-great-expectations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harry Reid may not be afraid of the Koch Brothers. But he&#8217;s trying to make Democrats very afraid of them.</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/03/13/harry-reid-isnt-afraid-of-the-koch-brothers-but-hes-trying-to-make-democrats-very-afraid-of-them/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/03/13/harry-reid-isnt-afraid-of-the-koch-brothers-but-hes-trying-to-make-democrats-very-afraid-of-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Cillizza]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign 2014]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/?p=84173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is a bit of a one-note Johnny these days. There's a problem in Washington? To hear Reid tell it, it's the fault of Charles and David Koch, the libertarian-minded brothers who have bankrolled a slew of ads slamming vulnerable Senate Democrats via Americans for Prosperity, one of their many quasi-political [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/03/13/harry-reid-isnt-afraid-of-the-koch-brothers-but-hes-trying-to-make-democrats-very-afraid-of-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin is a celebritician. But her endorsement can still matter.</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/03/13/sarah-palin-is-a-celebritician-but-her-endorsement-can-still-matter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/03/13/sarah-palin-is-a-celebritician-but-her-endorsement-can-still-matter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 19:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Sullivan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign 2014]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/?p=84078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was a time in the not-too-distant past when Sarah Palin was the endorsement to get in contested Republican primaries. That time has passed. But Palin is still picking favorites. She's made a trio of Senate endorsements this week and has promised more. A Palin seal of approval is not what it once was, but it [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/03/13/sarah-palin-is-a-celebritician-but-her-endorsement-can-still-matter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voters aren&#8217;t (really) all that worried right now about climate change</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/03/13/voters-arent-really-all-that-worried-right-now-about-climate-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/03/13/voters-arent-really-all-that-worried-right-now-about-climate-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wesley Lowery]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[113th Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/?p=83944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Democrats did their best to shove climate change back into the national conversation earlier this week when 28 Senators pulled an all-nighter at the Capitol building during which they delivered hours and hours of floor speeches about the need for legislative action. But other than some night-of media coverage, the climate change talkathon failed [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/03/13/voters-arent-really-all-that-worried-right-now-about-climate-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How many members of Congress smoke weed? Take a guess.</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/03/13/how-many-members-of-congress-smoke-weed-take-a-guess/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/03/13/how-many-members-of-congress-smoke-weed-take-a-guess/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 17:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Simon]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/?p=84124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Cannabis Industry Association held a press conference Thursday on Capitol Hill. Rep. Jared Polis (D-Colo.) — an ardent supporter of legalization efforts — was there and did a brief Q&#38;A. He was asked how many of his colleagues currently smoke marijuana. Watch his response:]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/03/13/how-many-members-of-congress-smoke-weed-take-a-guess/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
