Illinois voters: Keep the primary going!
Even as the Washington Republican political establishment grumbles about the possible ill effects of an extended primary fight for the party’s presidential nomination, voters in today’s Illinois race seem perfectly content for the race to continue for months, according to early exit polling.

CHICAGO, IL - MARCH 20: Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney (L) is shown a graph of internet traffic in Libya during the revolution by Engineering Site Lead Will Robinson at the Google Chicago headquarters March 20, 2012 in Chicago, Illinois. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)Approximately two-thirds of Illinois primary voters said they want their preferred candidate to prevail regardless of how long that might take. That includes three in four voters who voted for former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum who say they are willing to let the process play out for months so that he can be the nominee. Six in ten of those who backed former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney said the same.
That attitude stands in stark contrast to the view of many within the GOP establishment who have begun to go public with their concerns about a protracted primary fight.
“I think, overall, you’d have to say that the scales have moved from the long process being a positive to being a negative,”former Bush White House political guru Karl Rove said Monday during an appearance on Fox News Channel. “I don’t think anybody in their right mind thinks that this way the primaries have played out has been good for the Republican chances.”
The argument Rove is forwarding publicly — and many in the party’s professional class are making privately — is that the longer the primary goes on, the more likely it is that Romney will continue to be dragged to the ideological right, particularly on social issues, that will make it harder for him to court independents when the general election begins.
Those fears are exacerbated by the fact that most establishment Republicans believe that Romney is the all-but-certain nominee due to his large lead in the delegate count. Given that, in their minds, neither Santorum nor former House Speaker Newt Gingrich have any credible path to the 1,144 delegates needed to be the party’s standard-bearer, the idea of simply going through the motions for the next two months is particularly odious.
Of course, rank and file Republicans tend not to think like that. For most voters, the presidential race is only just starting. After all, just more than half of the country has voted. And, the general election isn’t for another eight months.
The average person is simply not engaged in the presidential race — or politics more generally — at the same (nerdy) level as those of us who spend their time in the nation’s capital. The race doesn’t exist for most folks until it hits their state. And once the presidential circus moves on, they don’t spend all that much time thinking about it.
And so, whether a long primary is a good thing or a bad one for Republicans in the fall, it looks like a long primary is what the party is going to get.
- Spam
- Obscene
- Duplicate
Blog Contributors
Chris Cillizza

Chris Cillizza is founder and editor of The Fix, a leading blog on state and national politics. He is the author of The Gospel According to the Fix: An Insider’s Guide to a Less than Holy World of Politics and an MSNBC contributor and political analyst. He also regularly appears on NBC and NPR’s The Diane Rehm Show. He joined The Post in 2005 and was named one of the top 50 journalists by Washingtonian in 2009.
Juliet Eilperin

Juliet Eilperin covers the White House for the Washington Post. She served as the Post's House of Representatives reporter from 1998-2004, covering the impeachment of Bill Clinton, lobbying, legislation, and five national congressional campaigns. Since 2004 she has been one of the country’s leading reporters covering the environment, reporting on science, policy and politics in areas including climate change, oceans, and air quality. She is the author of two books, "Fight Club Politics: How Partisanship is Poisoning the House of Representatives," and "Demon Fish: Travels Through the Hidden World of Sharks." Follow her on Twitter.
Ed O’Keefe

Ed O’Keefe covers Congress and politics for the Washington Post. He previously covered the 2008 and 2012 campaigns and reported on federal agencies and federal employees as author of The Federal Eye blog. Follow Ed on Twitter.
Aaron Blake

Aaron Blake covers national politics at the Washington Post, where he writes regularly for “The Fix,” the Post’s top political blog. A Minnesota native and summa cum laude graduate of the University of Minnesota, Aaron has also written about politics for the Minneapolis Star-Tribune and The Hill newspaper. Aaron and his wife, Danielle, live in Annandale, Va. Follow him on Twitter.
Sean Sullivan

Sean Sullivan covers national politics for “The Fix.” Prior to joining the Washington Post in the summer of 2012, Sean was the editor of Hotline On Call, National Journal Hotline’s politics blog. He has also worked for NHK Japan Public Broadcasting and ABC News. Sean is a graduate of Hamilton College, where he received a degree in Philosophy. He lives in Washington, D.C. Follow Sean on Twitter.
Scott Clement

Scott Clement is a survey research analyst for Capital Insight, the independent polling group of Washington Post Media. Scott specializes in public opinion about politics, election campaigns and public policy. He helps design and analyze all Washington Post polls, including the Washington Post-ABC News poll. Follow Scott on Twitter.
Rachel Weiner

Rachel Weiner covers national politics for Post Politics and The Fix. She came to the Washington Post in 2010 as a political web editor and anchored the Post's 2012 election blog. She was previously a web editor at The Huffington Post. Follow her on Twitter.










Loading...
Comments