wpostServer: http://css.washingtonpost.com/wpost

Mitt Romney won Illinois. So what?

at 08:42 PM ET, 03/20/2012

The decisive victory by Mitt Romney over Rick Santorum in today’s Illinois presidential primary proves everything and nothing — all at the same time.


Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney (R) is given a tour of the Google Chicago headquarters by Google Vice President Jim Lecinski (2nd R) March 20, 2012 in Chicago, Illinois. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Everything in the sense that Romney beat Santorum again in a large Midwestern state where a majority of voters don’t think of themselves as evangelicals and prize electability and experience as the most important traits for a Republican candidate to possess. Everything in the sense that Romney’s victory — coupled with some organizational flubs by Santorum — means that the former Massachusetts governor will extend his already near-determinative delegate lead.

And nothing in the sense that even Romney’s staunchest allies don’t expect him to pick up enough momentum to win the Louisiana’s caucuses set for Saturday, meaning that the “Romney can’t win the South” and “Romney can’t win conservatives over” storylines will linger as the calendar turns from March to April.

“Nothing impossible in Louisiana but Santorum [is] not likely to be closed out soon,” acknowledged Charlie Black, a longtime Republican campaign hand who is supporting Romney.

As we have written before, both Romney and Santorum have enough likely “wins” over the next two months of the nominating calendar to justify continuing on in the race.

April is perhaps Romney’s best potential month of the race with a series of Midwestern and Northeastern states set to vote; May looks promising for Santorum with the race turning back to the South and Plains.

Add to that calendar/geographic reality the fact that two-thirds of Illinois primary voters said they are comfortable with the race continuing on so that their preferred candidate can win and it seems entirely plausible that what happened in Illinois makes little difference as the race grinds forward.

Santorum and his surrogates will continue to make the case that the conservative win of the party still isn’t sold on Romney and by nominating him the GOP will be sacrificing their best chance at beating President Obama in the fall.

Romney and his side will argue that Santorum isn’t the true blue conservative he paints himself as and that he is ill equipped to win a fight with President Obama on the only issue most voters care about: the economy.

Overarching all of that spin is the cold, hard math.

There is little question that Santorum can’t overtake Romney in the delegate count and has only the longest of shots to reach the 1,144 delegates, which are needed to clinch the nomination. (Santorum’s take on where the delegate count stands currently is somewhat far fetched.)

And yet, as NBC’s “First Read” noted Tuesday morning, even if Romney won every single delegate available after today, he wouldn’t reach the magic 1,144 number until the May 29 primary. If he won 60 percent of the delegates, Romney wouldn’t get to the threshold number until the Utah primary on June 26.

What all that means is that the only way to “end” the race is for Santorum and Gingrich to bow to that delegate reality or for the establishment to try to, well, make them bow to that reality.

The first scenario — Santorum simply deciding to call it quits — seems very unlikely, particularly given that his decidedly uphill delegate path has been a reality since, at least, Super Tuesday and the former Pennsylvania senator continues to soldier on in the race.

The second scenario is slightly more likely although far from a sure thing. In truth, the major establishment figures of the Republican party have been very wary to wade into the “should this end now” argument for fear, wethinks, of pissing off the conservative/tea party base.

If you are, for example, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio why would you risk the negative blowback that could be directed at you if you step in and say “enough is enough”? You wouldn’t.

And so, the slog continues. Romney remains the all-but-certain winner but without the ability — at least so far — to land the single knockout blow he needs to convincingly end this race. Illinois didn’t change that. But in defense of the Prairie State, it’s hard to see any state playing that role at this point in the process.

Loading...

Comments

Add your comment
 
Read what others are saying About Badges

    Blog Contributors

    Chris Cillizza

    Chris Cillizza

    Chris Cillizza is founder and editor of The Fix, a leading blog on state and national politics. He is the author of The Gospel According to the Fix: An Insider’s Guide to a Less than Holy World of Politics and an MSNBC contributor and political analyst. He also regularly appears on NBC and NPR’s The Diane Rehm Show. He joined The Post in 2005 and was named one of the top 50 journalists by Washingtonian in 2009.

    Juliet Eilperin

    Juliet Eilperin

    Juliet Eilperin covers the White House for the Washington Post. She served as the Post's House of Representatives reporter from 1998-2004, covering the impeachment of Bill Clinton, lobbying, legislation, and five national congressional campaigns. Since 2004 she has been one of the country’s leading reporters covering the environment, reporting on science, policy and politics in areas including climate change, oceans, and air quality. She is the author of two books, "Fight Club Politics: How Partisanship is Poisoning the House of Representatives," and "Demon Fish: Travels Through the Hidden World of Sharks." Follow her on Twitter.

    Ed O’Keefe

    Ed O’Keefe

    Ed O’Keefe covers Congress and politics for the Washington Post. He previously covered the 2008 and 2012 campaigns and reported on federal agencies and federal employees as author of The Federal Eye blog. Follow Ed on Twitter.

    Aaron Blake

    Aaron Blake

    Aaron Blake covers national politics at the Washington Post, where he writes regularly for “The Fix,” the Post’s top political blog. A Minnesota native and summa cum laude graduate of the University of Minnesota, Aaron has also written about politics for the Minneapolis Star-Tribune and The Hill newspaper. Aaron and his wife, Danielle, live in Annandale, Va. Follow him on Twitter.

    Sean Sullivan

    Sean Sullivan

    Sean Sullivan covers national politics for “The Fix.” Prior to joining the Washington Post in the summer of 2012, Sean was the editor of Hotline On Call, National Journal Hotline’s politics blog. He has also worked for NHK Japan Public Broadcasting and ABC News. Sean is a graduate of Hamilton College, where he received a degree in Philosophy. He lives in Washington, D.C. Follow Sean on Twitter.

    Scott Clement

    Scott Clement

    Scott Clement is a survey research analyst for Capital Insight, the independent polling group of Washington Post Media. Scott specializes in public opinion about politics, election campaigns and public policy. He helps design and analyze all Washington Post polls, including the Washington Post-ABC News poll. Follow Scott on Twitter.

    Rachel Weiner

    Rachel Weiner

    Rachel Weiner covers national politics for Post Politics and The Fix. She came to the Washington Post in 2010 as a political web editor and anchored the Post's 2012 election blog. She was previously a web editor at The Huffington Post. Follow her on Twitter.

    Section:/blogs/the-fix