wpostServer: http://css.washingtonpost.com/wpost

Rick Santorum at odds with conservative base on issue of women in combat

at 10:33 AM ET, 02/10/2012

Rick Santorum may have committed one of the relatively few gaffes of his GOP presidential campaign by suggesting Thursday that women shouldn’t serve in combat roles because of “other types of emotions that are involved.”


Republican presidential candidate former Pennsylvania senator Santorum listens to a student's question at Oral Roberts University, Feb. 9, 2012, in Tulsa, Oklahoma. (Eric Gay - Associated Press)

Exactly what he meant by “other types of emotions” will be litigated in the hours and days ahead. But it’s also important to note that, even without the reference to emotions, Santorum’s position on the issue is at odds with most Americans and even the GOP base.

A Washington Post-ABC News poll from March 2011 showed Americans pretty well united behind the idea that women should be allowed to serve in combat roles, with nearly three-quarters on board.

(User poll: Will Santorum’s comments hurt his campaign?)

The poll showed 73 percent — about as close to a consensus as you can get in polling — favored the involvement of women in combat.

Even among voters labeling themselves “very conservative,” a strong majority — 58 percent — said they were in favor.

(Also interestingly, there wasn’t a big gender gap, with the numbers for men and women looking virtually the same.)

In other words, by taking a position against women in combat, Santorum is taking a stand against even a strong majority of the most ardent portion of the conservative base.

Now, is that the same as saying this is a major issue for Santorum? Not necessarily.

While his position may be at odds with most of his party, this issue isn’t exactly front-of-mind for many voters, and given the phasing out of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, there isn’t really a pressing news story that will drive the story line.

Though it should be noted that top Mitt Romney supporter and Virginia Gov Bob McDonnell tried to press the issue in his speech Friday at CPAC.

Referring to his Iraq veteran daughter, McDonnell noted that she was more than capable of facing combat.

“There were a couple of times when she’d call and tell me about the small arms fire that she’d encountered, either in her Humvee or in the Blackhawk,” McDonnell said (here’s video). “And yes, I did get a little bit emotional. But she didn’t. She got the job done.”

More than likely, Santorum will be forced to explain what his comments meant, and if he does a good job of it, the issue will go by the wayside. After all, it’s the comment about “emotions” that is the sticking point here.

But for the record, he’s not even with the vast majority of his fellow Republicans on this issue.

And for Santorum, that’s pretty rare.

Read more from PostPolitics

Rep. Spencer Bachus faces insider-trading probe

Obama to revise birth-control rule

Romney campaign stuck in lukewarm

Loading...

Comments

Add your comment
 
Read what others are saying About Badges

    Blog Contributors

    Chris Cillizza

    Chris Cillizza

    Chris Cillizza is founder and editor of The Fix, a leading blog on state and national politics. He is the author of The Gospel According to the Fix: An Insider’s Guide to a Less than Holy World of Politics and an MSNBC contributor and political analyst. He also regularly appears on NBC and NPR’s The Diane Rehm Show. He joined The Post in 2005 and was named one of the top 50 journalists by Washingtonian in 2009.

    Juliet Eilperin

    Juliet Eilperin

    Juliet Eilperin covers the White House for the Washington Post. She served as the Post's House of Representatives reporter from 1998-2004, covering the impeachment of Bill Clinton, lobbying, legislation, and five national congressional campaigns. Since 2004 she has been one of the country’s leading reporters covering the environment, reporting on science, policy and politics in areas including climate change, oceans, and air quality. She is the author of two books, "Fight Club Politics: How Partisanship is Poisoning the House of Representatives," and "Demon Fish: Travels Through the Hidden World of Sharks." Follow her on Twitter.

    Ed O’Keefe

    Ed O’Keefe

    Ed O’Keefe covers Congress and politics for the Washington Post. He previously covered the 2008 and 2012 campaigns and reported on federal agencies and federal employees as author of The Federal Eye blog. Follow Ed on Twitter.

    Aaron Blake

    Aaron Blake

    Aaron Blake covers national politics at the Washington Post, where he writes regularly for “The Fix,” the Post’s top political blog. A Minnesota native and summa cum laude graduate of the University of Minnesota, Aaron has also written about politics for the Minneapolis Star-Tribune and The Hill newspaper. Aaron and his wife, Danielle, live in Annandale, Va. Follow him on Twitter.

    Sean Sullivan

    Sean Sullivan

    Sean Sullivan covers national politics for “The Fix.” Prior to joining the Washington Post in the summer of 2012, Sean was the editor of Hotline On Call, National Journal Hotline’s politics blog. He has also worked for NHK Japan Public Broadcasting and ABC News. Sean is a graduate of Hamilton College, where he received a degree in Philosophy. He lives in Washington, D.C. Follow Sean on Twitter.

    Scott Clement

    Scott Clement

    Scott Clement is a survey research analyst for Capital Insight, the independent polling group of Washington Post Media. Scott specializes in public opinion about politics, election campaigns and public policy. He helps design and analyze all Washington Post polls, including the Washington Post-ABC News poll. Follow Scott on Twitter.

    Rachel Weiner

    Rachel Weiner

    Rachel Weiner covers national politics for Post Politics and The Fix. She came to the Washington Post in 2010 as a political web editor and anchored the Post's 2012 election blog. She was previously a web editor at The Huffington Post. Follow her on Twitter.

    Section:/blogs/the-fix