So who thinks Obama is helping the economy?
The new Washington Post/ABC News poll shows just 17 percent of Americans believe President Obama’s economic policies have made the economy better. Twice as many say he’s made things worse.
So just who is that 17 percent?
A review of the poll guts — poll guts are the best kind of guts — reveals that they are disproportionately young, non-white, hold advanced degrees, come from the Northeast, and strongly oppose the Tea Party.
In other words, the classic image of a liberal Democrat — and about the last demographic that Obama should (or maybe could) ever lose.
What that means in practical political terms is that Obama’s jobs speech tonight will have to convince the more middle-of-the-road constituencies who have begun deserting him in recent months that he has an economic plan that can and will work.
Let’s dig into the numbers.
The question the new Post/ABC poll asked is whether Obama has made the economy better, worse, or has had no effect.
Non-whites are still very much on-board with what Obama has done on the economy. Of that group, 36 percent say Obama has made things better, while just 21 percent say he has made things worse. (The New Ledger’s Ben Domenech has put together some great bar graphs to illustrate this and the other numbers below.)
Only slightly more people under 30 years old say he has hurt the economy than say he has helped it, 27 percent to 22 percent. Half say he has had no effect. That makes it Obama’s best age demographic on the economy — even as its overall approval of the president has dipped below 50 percent for the first time.
Among those with post-graduate degrees, 25 percent say both that he has made things better and made things worse. And Northeasterners are evenly divided as well, with 21 percent saying he’s made things better and 22 percent saying he’s made them worse.
Perhaps most interesting, though, are the tea party numbers.
Of those who strongly support the tea party, 75 percent think Obama has made things worse, while those who strongly oppose the tea party say he has either made things better (35 percent) or had no effect (54 percent). Only 8 percent of strong tea party opponents say Obama has made things worse.
These are all groups that Obama can’t afford to lose. They effectively represent the base of his base, and it’s little surprise that they would still believe what he’s doing is right. Even they, though, are struggling to find the good news in the continued economic troubles with many of them choosing the “no effect” option.
So what about the flipside? Who feels the most negatively about Obama’s handling of the economy?
White people, the Midwest, the middle class, 30-somethings and independents. Only 11 percent of whites say Obama has made things better with the nation’s economy. The Midwest is every bit as harsh as the South when it comes to critiquing Obama with both showing 38 percent saying he has made things worse.
How President Obama does among those harder-to-reach groups will be more instructive of his political prospects going forward — particularly given that the Midwest is shaping up to be a central battleground of the 2012 general election.
- Spam
- Obscene
- Duplicate
Blog Contributors
Chris Cillizza

Chris Cillizza is founder and editor of The Fix, a leading blog on state and national politics. He is the author of The Gospel According to the Fix: An Insider’s Guide to a Less than Holy World of Politics and an MSNBC contributor and political analyst. He also regularly appears on NBC and NPR’s The Diane Rehm Show. He joined The Post in 2005 and was named one of the top 50 journalists by Washingtonian in 2009.
Juliet Eilperin

Juliet Eilperin covers the White House for the Washington Post. She served as the Post's House of Representatives reporter from 1998-2004, covering the impeachment of Bill Clinton, lobbying, legislation, and five national congressional campaigns. Since 2004 she has been one of the country’s leading reporters covering the environment, reporting on science, policy and politics in areas including climate change, oceans, and air quality. She is the author of two books, "Fight Club Politics: How Partisanship is Poisoning the House of Representatives," and "Demon Fish: Travels Through the Hidden World of Sharks." Follow her on Twitter.
Ed O’Keefe

Ed O’Keefe covers Congress and politics for the Washington Post. He previously covered the 2008 and 2012 campaigns and reported on federal agencies and federal employees as author of The Federal Eye blog. Follow Ed on Twitter.
Aaron Blake

Aaron Blake covers national politics at the Washington Post, where he writes regularly for “The Fix,” the Post’s top political blog. A Minnesota native and summa cum laude graduate of the University of Minnesota, Aaron has also written about politics for the Minneapolis Star-Tribune and The Hill newspaper. Aaron and his wife, Danielle, live in Annandale, Va. Follow him on Twitter.
Sean Sullivan

Sean Sullivan covers national politics for “The Fix.” Prior to joining the Washington Post in the summer of 2012, Sean was the editor of Hotline On Call, National Journal Hotline’s politics blog. He has also worked for NHK Japan Public Broadcasting and ABC News. Sean is a graduate of Hamilton College, where he received a degree in Philosophy. He lives in Washington, D.C. Follow Sean on Twitter.
Scott Clement

Scott Clement is a survey research analyst for Capital Insight, the independent polling group of Washington Post Media. Scott specializes in public opinion about politics, election campaigns and public policy. He helps design and analyze all Washington Post polls, including the Washington Post-ABC News poll. Follow Scott on Twitter.
Rachel Weiner

Rachel Weiner covers national politics for Post Politics and The Fix. She came to the Washington Post in 2010 as a political web editor and anchored the Post's 2012 election blog. She was previously a web editor at The Huffington Post. Follow her on Twitter.










Loading...
Comments