Why Mitt Romney should win Illinois
If past is prologue, former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney should win the Illinois presidential primary on Tuesday.

Republican presidential candidate and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney greets diners at a restaurant during a campaign stop in Rosemont, Illinois March 16, 2012. REUTERS/Jim Young It’s not because he’s ahead — albeit narrowly — in most polling in the Prairie State. And, it’s not because he is a better ideological fit for the state than former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum.
It’s because of money.
But, wait, you argue. Romney has outspent Santorum in every single caucus and primary. And money hasn’t equaled certain success for Romney in lots of places — including Alabama and Mississippi earlier this week.
That’s true. But it amounts to an overly simplistic reading of how Romney’s financial advantage plays itself out on a state-by-state basis.
In order to grasp why Romney’s financial edge matters more in Illinois than in Alabama or Mississippi, you need to understand that the primary states fit relatively neatly into two basic categories: retail states and TV states.
Retail states tend to be smaller (population-wise) and, as a result of their size, voters have an expectation of seeing a candidate show and prove their quality on the campaign trail. These are states where it’s not entirely unreasonable to expect that you might be able to meet the candidates asking for your vote in a presidential race. They also tend to be states with one (or at most two) dominant media markets, meaning that if a candidate does an event in a big city in the state, he (or she) will get near-statewide exposure on the news that night.
States that have voted so far in the Republican presidential race that fit this model: Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Alabama and Mississippi (among others).
TV states are large population states where the only way most voters ever get to know a candidate is through ads. Retail politicking is largely pointless in these places; no candidate can hope to meet even a tenth of the people he needs to vote for him to win.
The TV states that have voted so far in the presidential primaries: Florida, Ohio and Michigan.
It doesn’t take a genius to notice that Romney tends to win TV states and lose retail states. (New Hampshire is the outlier but Romney’s geographic connection from being the governor of Massachusetts explains his success in that retail state.)
There are two reasons for that phenomenon.
First, Romney is, at best, an awkward presence on the campaign trail. He’s uncomfortable with the sort of close-quarters stumping that retail states demand. And voters pick up on that.
Second and more importantly, Romney’s spending edge is more impactful in a TV state where there are lots and lots of media markets and in which what happens in one part of the state doesn’t even get covered in other parts of the state. Take Florida. The Panhandle of the state and the Miami-Dade area have almost nothing — culturally or politically — in common. Romney could target TV messages to both types of voters in a way that Santorum or former House Speaker Newt Gingich just can’t. Money matters more in TV states than it does in retail ones.
Which brings us to Illinois where Romney and the super PAC supporting him are set to drastically outspend Santorum and his affiliated super PAC.
According to media buy information provided to the Fix on Thursday night, Restore Our Future, the super PAC supporting Romney, has already spent $2.4 million on television ads over the past two weeks in Illinois. Romney is spending another $1.1 million this week.
Compare that to Santorum who is spending $207,000 on ads in Illinois this week and the Red White & Blue Fund, Santorum’s super PAC, which is dropping $310,000 on television ads.
Total spending in Illinois (for you non-math majors out there): Romney and Restore Our Future $3.5 million, Santorum and Red White & Blue Fund $517,000. That’s roughly a seven-to-one edge.
Those spending numbers should be determinative for Romney in a TV state like Illinois. If they aren’t, he could have bigger problems on his hands.
Tags
- Spam
- Obscene
- Duplicate
Blog Contributors
Chris Cillizza

Chris Cillizza is founder and editor of The Fix, a leading blog on state and national politics. He is the author of The Gospel According to the Fix: An Insider’s Guide to a Less than Holy World of Politics and an MSNBC contributor and political analyst. He also regularly appears on NBC and NPR’s The Diane Rehm Show. He joined The Post in 2005 and was named one of the top 50 journalists by Washingtonian in 2009.
Juliet Eilperin

Juliet Eilperin covers the White House for the Washington Post. She served as the Post's House of Representatives reporter from 1998-2004, covering the impeachment of Bill Clinton, lobbying, legislation, and five national congressional campaigns. Since 2004 she has been one of the country’s leading reporters covering the environment, reporting on science, policy and politics in areas including climate change, oceans, and air quality. She is the author of two books, "Fight Club Politics: How Partisanship is Poisoning the House of Representatives," and "Demon Fish: Travels Through the Hidden World of Sharks." Follow her on Twitter.
Ed O’Keefe

Ed O’Keefe covers Congress and politics for the Washington Post. He previously covered the 2008 and 2012 campaigns and reported on federal agencies and federal employees as author of The Federal Eye blog. Follow Ed on Twitter.
Aaron Blake

Aaron Blake covers national politics at the Washington Post, where he writes regularly for “The Fix,” the Post’s top political blog. A Minnesota native and summa cum laude graduate of the University of Minnesota, Aaron has also written about politics for the Minneapolis Star-Tribune and The Hill newspaper. Aaron and his wife, Danielle, live in Annandale, Va. Follow him on Twitter.
Sean Sullivan

Sean Sullivan covers national politics for “The Fix.” Prior to joining the Washington Post in the summer of 2012, Sean was the editor of Hotline On Call, National Journal Hotline’s politics blog. He has also worked for NHK Japan Public Broadcasting and ABC News. Sean is a graduate of Hamilton College, where he received a degree in Philosophy. He lives in Washington, D.C. Follow Sean on Twitter.
Scott Clement

Scott Clement is a survey research analyst for Capital Insight, the independent polling group of Washington Post Media. Scott specializes in public opinion about politics, election campaigns and public policy. He helps design and analyze all Washington Post polls, including the Washington Post-ABC News poll. Follow Scott on Twitter.
Rachel Weiner

Rachel Weiner covers national politics for Post Politics and The Fix. She came to the Washington Post in 2010 as a political web editor and anchored the Post's 2012 election blog. She was previously a web editor at The Huffington Post. Follow her on Twitter.









Loading...
Comments