Most Read: Opinions

direct signup

Today’s Opinions poll

Would you use an app that tells you the partisan affiliation of products you're considering buying?

Review your answers and share
The Insiders
Posted at 09:16 AM ET, 11/10/2011

More GOP economic orthodoxy in debate

Unlike Ed, I thought the Republicans in Wednesday’s debate on the economy did a much better job of repeating their best applause lines, attacking President Obama and the media.

They also did a good job of presenting their economic orthodoxy: cut taxes and regulations to grow the economy. In that sense, this debate could have been held in any presidential cycle since 1980, a period in which Republicans have controlled the White House 20 out of 31 years. Perhaps this is why I found the debate boring and enervating. Are we really going to restore our economy with supply-side measures?

Only Jon Huntsman broke from same old. Twice he called for dismantling financial institutions that are “too big to fail”, a position that might give him a constituency among OWS.

The winner? Mitt Romney. He handled the flip-flop charge with some flustered indignity but spoke with passionate certainty about growing the economy.

Weirdest line of the night: Newt Gingrich attacked the media’s coverage of the economy because it doesn’t ask the Wall Street protestors how they would even have a park to protest in, if it weren’t for the capitalist system. Hmm.

Worst performance: Rick Perry. Hunters may have recognized his look through much of the evening — deer in the headlights.

And Herman Cain? He played the media foil very well. But there’s an old expression in politics: “don’t get into a [expletive] contest with someone who buys printer’s ink by the barrel.” Cain may have won a round last night, but the media has a lot of resources left. Stay tuned.

By  |  09:16 AM ET, 11/10/2011

Read what others are saying

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company