Most Read: Opinions

direct signup

Today’s Opinions poll

Would you use an app that tells you the partisan affiliation of products you're considering buying?

Submit
Next
Review your answers and share

Join a Discussion

Weekly schedule, past shows

The Insiders
Posted at 10:08 AM ET, 07/03/2012

Obama’s Money Advantage, Part II

First, to repeat what I said yesterday, President Obama, the DNC and his Super PACs have raised a lot more money than Mitt Romney, the RNC and his allied Super PACs.

Today, let’s look deeper, examining the stronger cash-on-hand position that Obama has compared with Romney and how the president is outspending Romney overall. 

To date, the Obama campaign has raised $255,162,109, while the Romney campaign has raised $121,023,126.  Advantage: Obama, ahead by $134,138,983. The Obama campaign has spent $147,747,393, with Romney’s campaign spending $104,036,499. Advantage: Again Obama, by $43,710,894. And Obama’s cash-on-hand advantage is huge — Obama has $109,718,115 on hand, Romney has $16,999,666. That gives Obama a 6 to 1 advantage over Romney, with over $92.7 million more in cash-on-hand! With four months left, that is a powerful position. Carter’s post today refers to the important feature of “liquidity” in campaign accounts. Nothing illustrates liquidity better than cash-on-hand.

Obama’s May fundraising numbers may have been what sparked his Air Force One phone call to donors. Obama’s campaign and the DNC combined raised $59.8 million in the month of May, approximately $17 million less than Romney’s campaign and the RNC, who raised $76.8 million total. And Obama did  end May with a deficit for the month — but that’s because his campaign outspent the Romney campaign.  Obama spent $69 million in May. Romney spent $15.6 million, over 4 to 1. 

Even adding in the “liquid” Super PAC money that Carter refers to does not strip away Obama’s money advantages. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, in May (campaign weeks 21-25), Obama Super PACs spent approximately $3.94 million and Romney Super PACs spent $7.34 million. That gives Romney the lead in Super PAC spending by about $3.4 million, but still means that Obama outspent Romney by about $50 million in May.

No matter what Obama says, he is not being outspent by Romney. I’m still looking for hard numbers for union money to Obama and Super PACs for both candidates at this point; and I’m not counting pledges that appear in the media because they are just that, unconfirmed media accounts of money Romney might get. I have yet to find any mention of union money that has been pledged for Obama in the mainstream media. If anybody sees a credible account of this, please send it in.

By  |  10:08 AM ET, 07/03/2012

 
Read what others are saying
     

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company