Most Read: Opinions

direct signup

Today’s Opinions poll

Would you use an app that tells you the partisan affiliation of products you're considering buying?

Review your answers and share
The Insiders
Posted at 12:02 PM ET, 03/13/2012

Obama’s tricky course in Afghanistan

As we await tonight’s GOP primary returns, foreign affairs, a distant issue so far in this campaign, has made a recent and stark appearance with the shootings of civilians in Afghanistan, a development President Obama called “tragic” and “shocking.” As I am sure the president knows, only half of that is true. Tragic, definitely, but not shocking.

Atrocities are an inevitable and horrible companion to war — from Roman times through the Middle Ages to modern conflict: Nanjing, My Lai, Abu Ghraib. As usual, American soldiers are not exempt from breaking the codes of conflict, but our country does a better job than most in acknowledging and punishing the crimes of war.

While the president bears no responsibility for the actions of a deranged soldier, he bears a lot for our war in Afghanistan. The war never seemed right to me. In other words, it seemed more driven by a political imperative than a strategic one. Democrats live in fear of being seen as soft on defense and foreign policy issues. Obama was already against one war: Iraq. Could he afford to oppose another?

Under this cynical interpretation, Obama could always say — as in fact he did throughout the 2008 campaign — that Sen. Hillary Clinton and then President Bush had supported the wrong war. Our enemy is not in Iraq, then-Sen. Obama argued, it’s in Afghanistan. Well, that’s certainly truer today than ever before. 

Mr. Obama has accomplished a lot in foreign policy in an increasingly hostile and unstable world. He has had a superb secretary of state. And he has come around to the only tenable position on the place known as the “graveyard of empires”: Get out. 

That course will be logistically tricky — our troops and support personnel are in more danger than ever — and politically contentious. The Republicans will return to their familiar playbook — but with a new twist. Not only will they attack the president for being weak, they will attack him for being a failure in Afghanistan. But only half of that will be true.

By  |  12:02 PM ET, 03/13/2012

Read what others are saying

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company