With Supreme Court loss, Aereo investors may be out nearly $100 million

The Supreme Court ruled that video streaming service provider Aereo is in violation of copyright law when it streams over-the-air TV channels to consumers. The Post's Brian Fung explains what the ruling means and how it will affect you. (Jason Aldag/The Washington Post)

 

Television streaming start-up Aereo had a lot riding on Wednesday's Supreme Court ruling over whether it owed re-transmission fees to broadcasters.

"If it’s a total, straight-up loss, then it’s dead," Aereo chief executive Chet Kanojia told the Verge in April. "We’re done."

Unluckily for Kanojia and the investors who put $97 million into the company, it was a straight-up loss: In a 6-3 ruling, the court sided with the broadcasters.

In a statement after the ruling, Kanojia didn't comment on specific plans, but did suggest that there still may be a future for the company. "Our work is not done," he said. "We will continue to fight for our consumers and fight to create innovative technologies that have a meaningful and positive impact on our world.”

Barry Diller, who was a major backer of the company through IAC/InterActiveCorp, argued that the ruling was not a big financial loss for his company -- but was a big loss for consumers.

Andrea Peterson covers technology policy for The Washington Post, with an emphasis on cybersecurity, consumer privacy, transparency, surveillance and open government.
Comments
Show Comments
Most Read Business
Next Story
Andrea Peterson · June 25