The Republican debate, Occupy Wall Street psychology and more [AM Briefing]

The Republican debate, as Brookings’ E.J. Dionne sees it. (Washington Post)

“No wonder the frustrated Wall Street protesters lack any specific proposals for change: We are effectively missing $500 billion a year in wages, and no one has a credible set of ideas that would bring it back,” says CFR’s Peter Orszag. (Bloomberg)

Room for Debate asks: What is the psychology behind the Occupy Wall Street protests? (New York Times)

Politico’s Arena asks: Can Mitt Romney take a punch? Wilson Center’s Aaron David Miller answers.

Victor Davis Hanson says Obama’s apologies around the globe for past U.S. actions say more about him than what he’s apologizing for. (National Review)

CAP’s Matt Duss takes on David Horowitz and Robert Spencer on their turf. (National Review)

The result of the Obama administration’s decision to upgrade Taiwan’s fleet of 145 F-16 jet aircraft. ( LA Times )

Allen McDuffee writes about politics and policy and covered think tanks for The Washington Post from 2011 to 2013. He blogs and hosts a podcast at governmentality.net and is currently working on a book about the influence of think tanks in Washington.

national

Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Comments
Show Comments
Most Read

national

Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters