A decade of debt ceiling votes in one graphic
Third Way has a nice graphic summing up the last 10 years of votes to increase the debt ceiling. The takeaway is predictable: When Republicans run things, they provide the votes to increase the debt limit, and when Democrats run things, they provide the votes to increase the debt limit. As Third Way says, “if there is a principle involved, it seems to be this: whose problem is it?”
But it’s not enough to glance at this chart and write this fight off as more Kabuki theatre. The debt ceiling is a bomb. And where defusing the bomb used to be a bipartisan duty, now it’s become a partisan, polarizing process, where whichever party doesn’t have to take responsibility for the bomb going off either jeers from the sidelines or uses the filibuster and/or control of one chamber to make it harder for the majority party to defuse the bomb. Usually, their efforts are for naught and the bomb is disarmed. But the whole process makes it much likelier that one or the other party will eventually fail, and the bomb will finally go off. And it only needs to go off once for the damage to be done.
What’s so striking is that all of this is completely unnecessary. The debt ceiling serves no obvious purpose. Most countries don’t have debt ceiling votes at all. The government is simply empowered to borrow whatever money is necessary to implement the laws the legislature has passed. If the legislature wants them to borrow less money, they pass laws making borrowing so much money unnecessary. Instead, we pass budgets and tax cuts and continuing resolutions with no mention of the debt ceiling, and then we occasionally have these incredibly reckless arguments over whether the government will continue paying its bills or stop paying its bills and lose its status as the world’s reserve currency. Sometimes, you wonder whether we deserve to be a superpower.
- Spam
- Obscene
- Duplicate
Blog Contributors
Ezra Klein

Ezra Klein is the editor of Wonkblog and a columnist at the Washington Post, as well as a contributor to MSNBC and Bloomberg. His work focuses on domestic and economic policymaking, as well as the political system that’s constantly screwing it up. He really likes graphs, and is on Twitter, Google+ and Facebook. E-mail him here.
Neil Irwin

Neil Irwin is a Washington Post columnist and the economics editor of Wonkblog. Each weekday morning his Econ Agenda column reports and explains the latest trends in economics, finance, and the policies that shape both. He is the author of “The Alchemists: Three Central Bankers and a World on Fire.” Follow him on Twitter here. Email him here.
Sarah Kliff

Sarah Kliff covers health policy, focusing on Medicare, Medicaid and the health reform law. She tries to fit in some reproductive health and education policy coverage, too, alongside an occasional hockey reference. Her work has appeared in Newsweek, Politico, and the BBC. She is on Twitter and Facebook.
Brad Plumer

Brad Plumer is a reporter focusing on energy and environmental issues. He was previously an associate editor at The New Republic. Follow him on Twitter. Email him here.
Dylan Matthews

Dylan Matthews covers taxes, poverty, campaign finance, higher education, and all things data. He has also written for The New Republic, Salon, Slate, and The American Prospect. Follow him on Twitter here. Email him here.











Loading...
Comments