Does the Etch a Sketch gaffe matter?
Joe Klein thinks Mitt Romney aide Erik Fehrnstrom’s Etch a Sketch gaffe “may go well beyond a momentary embarrassment and become a campaign-defining disaster, much as John Kerry’s ‘I voted for it before I voted against it’ gaffe.”

(Staff Illustration - The Washington Post)
Here’s my question: Do these “campaign-defining” moments actually matter? That is to say, do they change the way the public understands a campaign? Or are they “defining” because they pithily reflect how the public already understands a campaign, and would understand it even in their absence?
Take Rick Perry’s unbearable moment of debate-induced amnesia. Insofar as it mattered, it mattered because the former Texas governor had been a consistently horrible, embarrassing debater during his run in the GOP primary campaign. If it had been Romney who had been unable to remember the third item on a list, no one would have cared. But Perry’s campaign was tanking and had been for some time. Conversely, if Perry had drawled out his third agency, his reputation for being a terrible debater would still have been there, and his campaign would still have been headed for disaster. There was nothing about that gaffe that materially changed Perry’s fortunes. What changed Perry’s fortunes were the same things that made that gaffe matter.
Similarly, Fehrnstrom’s Etch a Sketch comment allows reporters, pundits and Romney’s opponents to further make fun of Romney’s long history of flip-flopping on issues and telling some audiences he’s a moderate who hates labels and others that he’s “severely conservative.”
But that history is very well known, and Romney’s opponents already have a long library of damaging clips and statements to include in ads. If Fehrnstrom had called in sick Wednesday, the public would still have been presented with evidence that Romney is not a sincere man. Will it really make a difference that the ads presenting that evidence now include an Etch a Sketch border?
I’m skeptical. My hunch is that these moments only become “campaign defining” if the campaign was already defined that way in the first place, and in that case, they don’t have much of an impact. If that’s right, the election won’t be any different at all because of the Etch a Sketch comment. Which isn’t to say that it won’t be defined by it.
- Spam
- Obscene
- Duplicate
Blog Contributors
Ezra Klein

Ezra Klein is the editor of Wonkblog and a columnist at the Washington Post, as well as a contributor to MSNBC and Bloomberg. His work focuses on domestic and economic policymaking, as well as the political system that’s constantly screwing it up. He really likes graphs, and is on Twitter, Google+ and Facebook. E-mail him here.
Neil Irwin

Neil Irwin is a Washington Post columnist and the economics editor of Wonkblog. Each weekday morning his Econ Agenda column reports and explains the latest trends in economics, finance, and the policies that shape both. He is the author of “The Alchemists: Three Central Bankers and a World on Fire.” Follow him on Twitter here. Email him here.
Sarah Kliff

Sarah Kliff covers health policy, focusing on Medicare, Medicaid and the health reform law. She tries to fit in some reproductive health and education policy coverage, too, alongside an occasional hockey reference. Her work has appeared in Newsweek, Politico, and the BBC. She is on Twitter and Facebook.
Brad Plumer

Brad Plumer is a reporter focusing on energy and environmental issues. He was previously an associate editor at The New Republic. Follow him on Twitter. Email him here.
Dylan Matthews

Dylan Matthews covers taxes, poverty, campaign finance, higher education, and all things data. He has also written for The New Republic, Salon, Slate, and The American Prospect. Follow him on Twitter here. Email him here.










Loading...
Comments