GDP revised downward. And the future’s not too bright, either.
In recent months, the economic news has been slightly better than expected. Not great, but okay. But that encouraging trend halted today, as the Commerce Department revised its third quarter GDP growth numbers downward. By a lot. Instead of growing at a 2.5 percent annualized rate last quarter, as we initially thought, the United States grew at just a 2 percent pace. If policymakers had been lulled into complacency by last month’s warm, fuzzy GDP numbers — well, they shouldn’t have been. Especially because the numbers could easily get worse.

(Mark Lennihan/AP)
Economist Justin Wolfers has been rummaging through the new GDP data and observes that the underlying fundamentals don’t look terribly encouraging either. He notes that the Gross Domestic Income data has been more accurate than the GDP figures of late — GDP revisions tend to move toward GDI, rather than vice versa. And the GDI has only grown at a 0.3 percent pace the past two quarters. That means it’s possible we’ve been growing much, much more slowly than the already-middling rate that the current numbers suggest. “At this point,” Wolfers notes, “we are only one small data revision away from declaring the US is in a recession, which began in mid-2011. Seriously.”
And even if that doesn’t happen, the future isn’t looking too rosy. Already this morning, the contagion in Europe is starting to spread to once-safe countries like Austria and Belgium, which are seeing their bond yields spike to worrisome levels. And, as Suzy reported yesterday, the United States can expect a further fiscal drag on its economy next year if the unemployment benefits and the payroll tax cut expire (not at all unlikely at this point, given the supercommittee’s failure). If the economy was growing rapidly, we might have enough momentum to speed right over these bumps. But that momentum’s getting harder and harder to detect.
- Spam
- Obscene
- Duplicate
Blog Contributors
Ezra Klein

Ezra Klein is the editor of Wonkblog and a columnist at the Washington Post, as well as a contributor to MSNBC and Bloomberg. His work focuses on domestic and economic policymaking, as well as the political system that’s constantly screwing it up. He really likes graphs, and is on Twitter, Google+ and Facebook. E-mail him here.
Neil Irwin

Neil Irwin is a Washington Post columnist and the economics editor of Wonkblog. Each weekday morning his Econ Agenda column reports and explains the latest trends in economics, finance, and the policies that shape both. He is the author of “The Alchemists: Three Central Bankers and a World on Fire.” Follow him on Twitter here. Email him here.
Sarah Kliff

Sarah Kliff covers health policy, focusing on Medicare, Medicaid and the health reform law. She tries to fit in some reproductive health and education policy coverage, too, alongside an occasional hockey reference. Her work has appeared in Newsweek, Politico, and the BBC. She is on Twitter and Facebook.
Brad Plumer

Brad Plumer is a reporter focusing on energy and environmental issues. He was previously an associate editor at The New Republic. Follow him on Twitter. Email him here.
Dylan Matthews

Dylan Matthews covers taxes, poverty, campaign finance, higher education, and all things data. He has also written for The New Republic, Salon, Slate, and The American Prospect. Follow him on Twitter here. Email him here.










Loading...
Comments