wpostServer: http://css.washingtonpost.com/wpost

Is cheap natural gas always a good thing?

at 10:32 AM ET, 01/21/2012

Recently, I noted a budding policy debate over whether the United States should export its newly abundant shale gas. Opponents have argued that exporting gas could hike prices here at home, hurting consumers.


(Spencer Platt/Getty)
Now those opponents, such as Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), are getting some additional support for their arguments. The Energy Information Administration just released a study today estimating that domestic gas prices could rise as much as 54 percent by 2018 if current plans to create half a dozen new gas-export terminals come to pass. (The Energy Department would have to approve these terminals.) As the Wall Street Journal reports, some U.S. industries that rely on cheap natural gas, such as Dow Chemical, don’t seem particularly thrilled with that prospect, and are opposing a massive export boom. But is cheap natural gas always an unmitigated blessing?

Not necessarily. For one thing, as Dan Stumpf notes, natural gas prices are in freefall right now, thanks to a frenzy of shale-rock fracking and an unnaturally warm winter that is depressing demand. At some point in the future, presumably, the price could go so low that gas companies no longer find it profitable to keep producing. It’s quite possible to imagine scenarios in which the economy might actually benefit from higher gas prices, if only to support increased production. So that’s one possible point in favor of boosting exports.

Meanwhile, from an environmental and climate perspective, rock-bottom gas prices aren’t always a net plus. True, cheap gas is helping to drive older coal plants into retirement right now — and, since burning natural gas for electricity emits just half the carbon that burning coal does, that’s a huge gain from a global-warming perspective. But on the flip side, the gas glut could also undercut the development of wind, solar, carbon capture and other clean-energy sources. As Mason Inman reports, a recent MIT study examined different emissions and policy scenarios and found that ultra-cheap natural gas could crowd out other forms of energy — eventually leading to higher emissions and making climate targets harder to meet. So there’s no easy, pat answer here.

Loading...

Comments

Add your comment
 
Read what others are saying About Badges

    Blog Contributors

    Ezra Klein

    Ezra Klein

    Ezra Klein is the editor of Wonkblog and a columnist at the Washington Post, as well as a contributor to MSNBC and Bloomberg. His work focuses on domestic and economic policymaking, as well as the political system that’s constantly screwing it up. He really likes graphs, and is on Twitter, Google+ and Facebook. E-mail him here.

    Neil Irwin

    Neil Irwin

    Neil Irwin is a Washington Post columnist and the economics editor of Wonkblog. Each weekday morning his Econ Agenda column reports and explains the latest trends in economics, finance, and the policies that shape both. He is the author of “The Alchemists: Three Central Bankers and a World on Fire.” Follow him on Twitter here. Email him here.

    Sarah Kliff

    Sarah Kliff

    Sarah Kliff covers health policy, focusing on Medicare, Medicaid and the health reform law. She tries to fit in some reproductive health and education policy coverage, too, alongside an occasional hockey reference. Her work has appeared in Newsweek, Politico, and the BBC. She is on Twitter and Facebook.

    Brad Plumer

    Brad Plumer

    Brad Plumer is a reporter focusing on energy and environmental issues. He was previously an associate editor at The New Republic. Follow him on Twitter. Email him here.

    Dylan Matthews

    Dylan Matthews

    Dylan Matthews covers taxes, poverty, campaign finance, higher education, and all things data. He has also written for The New Republic, Salon, Slate, and The American Prospect. Follow him on Twitter here. Email him here.

    Section:/blogs/ezra-klein