Joe Lieberman’s new plan to save Medicare, and his old one

(Andrew Harrer - Bloomberg)
Joe Lieberman is pushing a Medicare plan that would save $200 billion over 10 years and — though this may be the dreaded “double-counting,” in which case it’s better to say “or” — extend the program’s solvency by 20 years. The proposal is pretty straightforward: retirement age to 67, higher premiums and co-pays, Medigap reform and higher taxes on wealthy beneficiaries. No privatization, or really structural reform of any kind.
Which means it’s a bit of a Band-Aid. And perhaps that’s all right, at least as a stopgap measure. I’m against raising the retirement age — I prefer the position Lieberman held in 2009, when he wanted to lower it to 55 — but Medicare probably should include more in the way of deductibles and co-pays, at least for beneficiaries who can afford them. That said, unless we’re going to keep ratcheting deductibles and taxes up while yanking benefits back, you need more in the way of reforms. Otherwise, cost growth will chew up your tweaks pretty much as fast as you can make them.
Which is why I’m sorry to see Lieberman made no mention of the Rockefeller-Lieberman-Whitehouse proposal to strengthen the Independent Payment Advisory Board . They would’ve eliminated the exemption hospitals enjoy until 2019, clarified that the board could change payments for all providers and suppliers, accelerated the schedule for recommendations and tightened the ultimate spending targets. It’d also have allowed the board to make recommendations for the private plans in the exchanges. Another plan worst dusting off would’ve been the package of delivery-system reforms that some of the Senate’s then-freshmen legislators proposed.
Both proposals were an attempt at more cost control, as opposed to merely more cost cutting/shifting. But first with Ryan and now with Lieberman, the focus seems to be moving away from the hard and complicated work of cost control and toward easier-to-explain, but harder-to-sustain, efforts at cost cutting/shifting.
- Spam
- Obscene
- Duplicate
Blog Contributors
Ezra Klein

Ezra Klein is the editor of Wonkblog and a columnist at the Washington Post, as well as a contributor to MSNBC and Bloomberg. His work focuses on domestic and economic policymaking, as well as the political system that’s constantly screwing it up. He really likes graphs, and is on Twitter, Google+ and Facebook. E-mail him here.
Neil Irwin

Neil Irwin is a Washington Post columnist and the economics editor of Wonkblog. Each weekday morning his Econ Agenda column reports and explains the latest trends in economics, finance, and the policies that shape both. He is the author of “The Alchemists: Three Central Bankers and a World on Fire.” Follow him on Twitter here. Email him here.
Sarah Kliff

Sarah Kliff covers health policy, focusing on Medicare, Medicaid and the health reform law. She tries to fit in some reproductive health and education policy coverage, too, alongside an occasional hockey reference. Her work has appeared in Newsweek, Politico, and the BBC. She is on Twitter and Facebook.
Brad Plumer

Brad Plumer is a reporter focusing on energy and environmental issues. He was previously an associate editor at The New Republic. Follow him on Twitter. Email him here.
Dylan Matthews

Dylan Matthews covers taxes, poverty, campaign finance, higher education, and all things data. He has also written for The New Republic, Salon, Slate, and The American Prospect. Follow him on Twitter here. Email him here.










Loading...
Comments