wpostServer: http://css.washingtonpost.com/wpost

Liberals to Pelosi: Stop helping the 2 percent!

at 01:30 PM ET, 05/25/2012

At first glance, Nancy Pelosi’s call to extend tax breaks to everyone earning under $1 million seems firmly in line with the liberal consensus. “It is unacceptable to hold tax cuts for the middle class hostage to extending multi-billion dollar tax breaks for millionaires,” the House Minority Leader wrote in a letter to John Boehner, demanding an immediate vote for a permanent extension of middle-class tax cuts. But a group of liberal advocates believe she’s giving away too much already.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi gestures at her weekly news conference on Capitol Hill on Thursday. (J. Scott Applewhite - AP)

Contra Pelosi, a new liberal coalition called Americans for Tax Fairness believes the threshold for extending the Bush tax cuts should be $250,000, not $1 million. By moving the threshold from $250,000 to $1 million, the government would receive 43 percent less revenue, or between $26 billion and $30 billion in 2013 alone, the group argues, citing analysis from Citizens for Tax Justice. CTJ, a member of the coalition, also points out that those earning more than $1 million would disproportionately benefit from a higher threshold, because they would pay a lower marginal rate on all their income from $250,000 to $1 million. Former White House adviser Jared Bernstein isn’t happy about Pelosi’s proposal, either.

So if Pelosi is advocating ending tax breaks for the richest 1 percent — whose average income in 2011 was $1.5 million — liberal advocates want her to extend it to the richest 2 percent, who’d be hit by tax increases over $250,000. This doesn’t mean civil war on the left just yet: Americans for Tax Fairness didn’t call Pelosi out by name, only vaguely alluding to “proposals on the table” in Congress. But it’s a warning shot.

Loading...

Comments

Add your comment
 
Read what others are saying About Badges

    Blog Contributors

    Ezra Klein

    Ezra Klein

    Ezra Klein is the editor of Wonkblog and a columnist at the Washington Post, as well as a contributor to MSNBC and Bloomberg. His work focuses on domestic and economic policymaking, as well as the political system that’s constantly screwing it up. He really likes graphs, and is on Twitter, Google+ and Facebook. E-mail him here.

    Neil Irwin

    Neil Irwin

    Neil Irwin is a Washington Post columnist and the economics editor of Wonkblog. Each weekday morning his Econ Agenda column reports and explains the latest trends in economics, finance, and the policies that shape both. He is the author of “The Alchemists: Three Central Bankers and a World on Fire.” Follow him on Twitter here. Email him here.

    Sarah Kliff

    Sarah Kliff

    Sarah Kliff covers health policy, focusing on Medicare, Medicaid and the health reform law. She tries to fit in some reproductive health and education policy coverage, too, alongside an occasional hockey reference. Her work has appeared in Newsweek, Politico, and the BBC. She is on Twitter and Facebook.

    Brad Plumer

    Brad Plumer

    Brad Plumer is a reporter focusing on energy and environmental issues. He was previously an associate editor at The New Republic. Follow him on Twitter. Email him here.

    Dylan Matthews

    Dylan Matthews

    Dylan Matthews covers taxes, poverty, campaign finance, higher education, and all things data. He has also written for The New Republic, Salon, Slate, and The American Prospect. Follow him on Twitter here. Email him here.

    Section:/blogs/ezra-klein