wpostServer: http://css.washingtonpost.com/wpost

Romney wants defense spending to be much, much higher. The public doesn’t.

at 09:12 AM ET, 05/15/2012

There’s a yawning gap between how much the average American wants to cut defense spending in 2013 (18 percent) and how much Washington lawmakers want to cut (zero, or pretty close to it). But the gap between public opinion and Mitt Romney’s plan is much, much bigger.
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney. (Carlos Osorio - AP)

Travis Sharp, a budget analysis at the Center for a New American Security, ran the numbers based on Romney’s plan for defense spending for CNNMoney and found that the presumptive GOP nominee would increase Pentagon spending in 2013 by $96 billion. That’s about a 17 percent increase over 2012 spending levels—nearly the same amount by which the public wants to decrease the defense budget, according to the Stimson Center’s recent study.
(SOURCE: CALCULATIONS BASED ON DATA FROM THE STIMSON CENTER, CNN MONEY)

Sharp based his calculation on Romney’s campaign promise to make the base defense budget—discretionary spending that excludes the cost of war in Iraq/Afghanistan—at least 4 percent of GDP every year. By contrast, the Pentagon’s current base budget is 3.3 percent of GDP in 2013, according to the Office of Management and Budget. (To be more precise, Romney’s Pentagon budget covers about 95 percent of total defense spending, but it’s close enough for a ballpark estimate.)

Defense costs would mount up even more quickly in later years: If Romney’s plan were adopted for the next decade, defense spending would increase by $2.1 trillion by 2022, as compared to the Defense Department’s current base budget plan, Sharp tells CNN.
(SOURCE: CNNMONEY)

Loading...

Comments

Add your comment
 
Read what others are saying About Badges

    Blog Contributors

    Ezra Klein

    Ezra Klein

    Ezra Klein is the editor of Wonkblog and a columnist at the Washington Post, as well as a contributor to MSNBC and Bloomberg. His work focuses on domestic and economic policymaking, as well as the political system that’s constantly screwing it up. He really likes graphs, and is on Twitter, Google+ and Facebook. E-mail him here.

    Neil Irwin

    Neil Irwin

    Neil Irwin is a Washington Post columnist and the economics editor of Wonkblog. Each weekday morning his Econ Agenda column reports and explains the latest trends in economics, finance, and the policies that shape both. He is the author of “The Alchemists: Three Central Bankers and a World on Fire.” Follow him on Twitter here. Email him here.

    Sarah Kliff

    Sarah Kliff

    Sarah Kliff covers health policy, focusing on Medicare, Medicaid and the health reform law. She tries to fit in some reproductive health and education policy coverage, too, alongside an occasional hockey reference. Her work has appeared in Newsweek, Politico, and the BBC. She is on Twitter and Facebook.

    Brad Plumer

    Brad Plumer

    Brad Plumer is a reporter focusing on energy and environmental issues. He was previously an associate editor at The New Republic. Follow him on Twitter. Email him here.

    Dylan Matthews

    Dylan Matthews

    Dylan Matthews covers taxes, poverty, campaign finance, higher education, and all things data. He has also written for The New Republic, Salon, Slate, and The American Prospect. Follow him on Twitter here. Email him here.

    Section:/blogs/ezra-klein