wpostServer: http://css.washingtonpost.com/wpost

‘We’re sleeping between the Capitol and the Supreme Court. We’re really at ground zero.’

at 10:16 AM ET, 03/26/2012


Supporters of the health reform law rally outside the Supreme Court on Sunday morning. (Sarah Kliff | The Washington Post)
The worst part of waiting outside the Supreme Court for 72 hours has to be the sprinklers. They come on each night, sometime around 2 or 3 a.m., and drench the dozens of people in line waiting to hear oral arguments on the health reform law.

“The worst part is the wet and the cold,” says Kathie McClure. When a thunderstorm came through on Saturday night, some linestanders asked if they could take shelter under the Supreme Court’s portico. A police officer said they could – but they would lose their spot in line.

When I last saw McClure, it was Friday afternoon around 3 p.m. The 57-year-old lawyer from Atlanta had just taken her spot as fifth in line to hear oral arguments. There were eight people in line, and a handful of reporters milling about.

Things looked pretty different when I caught her this morning: The scene outside the Supreme Court is a media circus, with hundreds of supporters of the Affordable Care Act (and a dozen or so opponents) rallying in front. There’s even a full brass band accompanying the supporters. Chants of “We love Obamacare!” go up against “We love the Constitution!”

“Some of this may be over my head,” Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.) told reporters on his way into the Supreme Court. He nabbed a ticket for the Anti-Injunction Act arguments this morning, which will look at whether the Supreme Court even has standing to rule on the law.

“What is running through my brain as a non-attorney, when you read what this is premised on, the Wickard v. Filburn decision,” Johnson said. “There the Supreme Court decided unanimously that a wheat farmer didn’t have the right to decide how much wheat to grow for himself and feed his chickens. The way I view this is we’re being held captive by idiotic legal precedent.”

Johnson arrived at the Court about an hour before oral arguments were set to begin at 10 a.m. (they will reportedly be delayed for about a half-hour as the Supreme Court reads unrelated opinions). McClure, for her part, had been at the Court for about 60 hours – ten times longer than the entire oral arguments will last.

She’s showered three times at a nearby location that she doesn’t want to disclose. She’s been interviewed by pretty much every major media outlet, from the New York Times to CNN. She may have gotten one or two hours of sleep last night, at most.

“I’m honestly surprised I can hold a conversation at this point,” McClure says. She could have gone into today’s arguments, but is holding out for a seat Tuesday, when the Court takes up the health reform law’s individual mandate.

Camping out hasn’t been easy – McClure compares it to a two-week trip she took down the Grand Canyon in terms of rigor. But there are good parts, too.

“We’re sleeping between the Capitol and the Supreme Court building,” she says. “You can feel the earth moving around this place because we’re really at Ground Zero.”

McClure will be outside the Court for another 24 hours. After that, she says, her first order of business will be to take a nap.

“Then I’m going to wash my hair,” she says. “I do have on fresh clothes today, which is a very exciting thing.”

Loading...

Comments

Add your comment
 
Read what others are saying About Badges

    Blog Contributors

    Ezra Klein

    Ezra Klein

    Ezra Klein is the editor of Wonkblog and a columnist at the Washington Post, as well as a contributor to MSNBC and Bloomberg. His work focuses on domestic and economic policymaking, as well as the political system that’s constantly screwing it up. He really likes graphs, and is on Twitter, Google+ and Facebook. E-mail him here.

    Neil Irwin

    Neil Irwin

    Neil Irwin is a Washington Post columnist and the economics editor of Wonkblog. Each weekday morning his Econ Agenda column reports and explains the latest trends in economics, finance, and the policies that shape both. He is the author of “The Alchemists: Three Central Bankers and a World on Fire.” Follow him on Twitter here. Email him here.

    Sarah Kliff

    Sarah Kliff

    Sarah Kliff covers health policy, focusing on Medicare, Medicaid and the health reform law. She tries to fit in some reproductive health and education policy coverage, too, alongside an occasional hockey reference. Her work has appeared in Newsweek, Politico, and the BBC. She is on Twitter and Facebook.

    Brad Plumer

    Brad Plumer

    Brad Plumer is a reporter focusing on energy and environmental issues. He was previously an associate editor at The New Republic. Follow him on Twitter. Email him here.

    Dylan Matthews

    Dylan Matthews

    Dylan Matthews covers taxes, poverty, campaign finance, higher education, and all things data. He has also written for The New Republic, Salon, Slate, and The American Prospect. Follow him on Twitter here. Email him here.

    Section:/blogs/ezra-klein