If a series of automatic federal budgets cuts were to go into effect through a process known as sequestration, it would drastically alter the business landscape for many of the region’s prominent defense contractors. Here’s a primer on what the companies have said and done so far when it comes to sequestration.
The Bethesda-based contractor had planned to send layoff notices to employees, which it claimed were required under a law known as the WARN Act. It backed off when the federal government gave new guidance. The Office of Management and Budget wrote in a memo that contractors' liability and litigation costs related to WARN would be "allowable costs" covered by the contracting agency.
This commenter is a Washington Post contributor. Post contributors aren’t staff, but may write articles or columns. In some cases, contributors are sources or experts quoted in a story.
Comments our editors find particularly useful or relevant are displayed in Top Comments, as are comments by users with these badges: . Replies to those posts appear here, as well as posts by staff writers.
To pause and restart automatic updates, click "Live" or "Paused". If paused, you'll be notified of the number of additional comments that have come in.
Comments our editors find particularly useful or relevant are displayed in Top Comments, as are comments by users with these badges: . Replies to those posts appear here, as well as posts by staff writers.
Loading...
Comments