Legal rights to a trademark are country-specific, and without a registered trademark in China, it’s nearly impossible for True Religion to enforce against Chinese counterfeiters, said Akin Gump partner Steve Kho, who is representing the denim retailer.
A growing number of small and mid-size businesses are grappling with similar dilemmas as they look to expand their brand overseas, often finding that an unaffiliated company or individual there already owns, or is trying to register, the rights to their trademark. Those businesses are increasingly tapping the District’s cadre of international trade attorneys with expertise in cross-border enforcement of intellectual property rights — and access to policymakers who could influence the Chinese government to enforce intellectual property laws.
“In certain countries, these are less of a straight-up legal issue and more of a legal-policy issue, because you’re dealing with authorities that care less about IP enforcement than other legal enforcement,” Kho said. “Usually, the stronger the messenger, the stronger the message will be.”
Product Partners, which produces the popular home fitness program BeachBody, also retained lobbyists to help combat the production of counterfeit DVDs in China, paying Akin Gump $90,000 last year and Cozen O’Connor $60,000 this year to lobby on intellectual property rights and counterfeiting issues in China, according to lobbying registration records. Akin Gump lawyers and BeachBody’s local Chinese counsel helped launch an investigation and raid of a Chinese company that packaged unauthorized BeachBody DVDs. A criminal prosecution by local authorities is pending.
For True Religion, a Vernon, Calif.-based company with a three-person legal team, finding an outside firm with a presence on Capitol Hill and a command of Chinese trademark law was key.
“We went with outside counsel to help us see if there were other political mechanisms we could use to communicate with the trademark office in China,” said True Religion general counsel Deborah Greaves. “We needed international expertise. Some things get lost in translation. ... They helped us understand and interpret the decision of the [Chinese] trademark office.”
Loading...
Comments