AT&T to fight DOJ attempt to block T-Mobile merger

The Justice Department on Wednesday sued to block AT&T’s $39 billion pursuit of T-Mobile, saying the deal would leave consumers with fewer choices and higher bills for mobile phone service that has become “indispensable” to the way Americans live and do business.

AT&T immediately vowed to challenge the lawsuit, setting the stage for the most significant antitrust battle of the Obama administration, which had vowed to rigorously police big business deals that are bad for consumers. But Justice has rarely gone to court to stop blockbuster deals, and it failed the last time it sued to prevent a big corporate merger, seven years ago.

Graphic

Graphic: The history of wireless mergers, dating back to 2002.
Click Here to View Full Graphic Story

Graphic: The history of wireless mergers, dating back to 2002.

Video

Justice Department officials say they've filed suit to block AT&T's $39 billion deal to buy T-Mobile USA. (Aug. 31)

Justice Department officials say they've filed suit to block AT&T's $39 billion deal to buy T-Mobile USA. (Aug. 31)

More on this Story

View all Items in this Story

HP to sell one last batch of $99 TouchPad tablets

Read story

Justice officials said the outcome of the deal, which would combine the second- and fourth-largest wireless companies, made their decision clear.

“Unless this merger is blocked . . . consumers will suffer,” said Sharis A. Pozen, acting assistant attorney general in Justice’s Antitrust Division. “Any way you look at this transaction, it is anti-competitive.”

The Justice Department did battle with an earlier version of AT&T, famously breaking up “Ma Bell” in 1984. But since then, AT&T has reestablished itself as one the best-connected companies in Washington, armed with a massive lobbying operation.

Justice’s decision comes at a sensitive time for President Obama, who is launching his reelection campaign and facing complaints from businesses that his administration is getting in the way of efforts to spur economic growth and create jobs.

Deputy Attorney General James M. Cole said Wednesday that the department’s decision would actually “protect jobs in this economy.”

For months, AT&T has been arguing the opposite, saying the merger would put “tens of thousands” of people to work by bringing wireless high-speed Internet access to an additional 55 million Americans.

In a show of goodwill, AT&T senior executives on Tuesday met with Justice officials to tell them that they would bring 5,000 call-center jobs back to the United States from overseas. The executives got no hint that a day later Justice would file suit, according to a source familiar with the meeting.

“We are surprised and disappointed by today’s action,” AT&T General Counsel Wayne Watts said in a statement. He said the company would ask the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia for an expedited hearing. “We remain confident that this merger is in the best interests of consumers and our country, and the facts will prevail in court.”

AT&T has a lot to lose. If the merger does not conclude by September 2012, the company will have to hand over $3 billion worth of wireless spectrum and other assets to T-Mobile’s parent company, Deutsche Telekom. AT&T would also have to pay $3 billion in cash, which would be the largest breakup fee in history, according to Thomson Reuters.

AT&T’s stock dropped 3.8 percent, to $28.48, on Wednesday. Shares of Sprint Nextel, the nation’s third-largest carrier, rose 5.9 percent, to $3.76. Sprint had warned that its business couldn’t survive if the merger was approved, and it had been interested in buying T-Mobile before AT&T’s bid.

Loading...

Comments

Add your comment
 
Read what others are saying About Badges