The Washington Post

SEC letter draws concern about policy of purging records

The SEC’s longtime policy of purging certain case files could make it harder for anyone to second-guess regulators’ decisions to drop inquiries without taking enforcement action.

That’s one of the implications of an August 2010 letter by a Securities and Exchange Commission official responding to concerns from the National Archives.

The official assured the National Archives that, as it reassessed its policy last summer, the agency responsible for policing Wall Street directed its staff to preserve documents.

“The documents subject to this hold include any correspondence, interagency memoranda or other documents supporting a decision not to open a formal investigation,” wrote Samuel J. Waldon, assistant chief counsel in the SEC’s enforcement division.

For more than a decade, the SEC had instructed its enforcement staff to dispose of documents obtained as part of inquiries that did not lead to full-fledged investigations.

An SEC employee named Darcy Flynn alerted the National Archives and Records Administration to the policy last year, and the federal record-keeping agency asked the SEC for an explanation.

The history was publicized last week, when Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) released a letter from Flynn’s lawyer alleging that the agency illegally destroyed records.

Grassley argued that the destruction of records could cause other harm: It could make it harder for the SEC to detect patterns over time, and it could deprive the agency of information that could be useful in future investigations.

The SEC has been on the defensive about its decisions not to pursue certain investigative leads, most notably tips about Bernard Madoff, who for years got away with a massive fraud.

Flynn’s lawyer, former SEC official Gary J. Aguirre, suggested that decisions to drop cases were influenced by the revolving door that ties the SEC to the industry it polices.

The files that the SEC for many years instructed employees to purge were known as MUIs, or “matters under inquiry.”

Whether the SEC violated federal law is an open question.

SEC spokesman John Nester declined to say, citing an ongoing review.

Aguirre has argued that the SEC was required to retain records typically found in MUIs for at least 25 years.

The answer may be riding on the definition of MUI — more specifically, whether that is just another term for “preliminary investigation.”

A “Records Retention Schedule” from 1997, spelling out which records the SEC was supposed to preserve and for how long, says that investigative case files, “including case files relating to preliminary investigations,” should be destroyed 25 years after the case is closed or, if they were especially important, kept permanently.

The SEC spokesman said an SEC enforcement manual “clearly distinguishes between matters under inquiry and investigations.”

But the SEC’s August 2010 response to the National Archives made no such distinction.

“The MUI system was originally created as an electronic database for tracking preliminary investigations,” the SEC’s Waldon wrote.

“Over time, enforcement staff began to use the term MUI to refer to a preliminary investigation, or the period of investigation prior to a formal investigation,” he added.

The National Archives and Records Administration has sent mixed messages. In a statement last week, it said MUIs were not covered by “a NARA-approved disposition schedule.” But it said that meant the SEC did not have authority to dispose of the records.

If the SEC treated MUIs and preliminary investigations differently, there should be ample proof for ongoing probes to uncover — the preserved files of countless preliminary investigations.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
From clubfoot to climbing: Double amputee lives life of adventure
Learn to make traditional soup dumplings
In defense of dads
Play Videos
How to make head cheese
Perks of private flying
The rise and fall of baseball cards
Play Videos
Husband finds love, loss in baseball
New hurdles for a Maryland tradition
How to survive a shark attack
Play Videos
Portland's most important meal of the day
What you need to know about Legionnaires' disease
How to save and spend money at college

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.