House leaders are now working with Senate leaders to craft an alternative plan to raise the federal debt limit, but so far they have not reached agreement on a way to meet an Aug. 2 deadline and avert a potentially major fiscal crisis.
Word of the collapse of the talks came hours after Obama publicly reiterated his insistence that any broad deficit-reduction plan must include new tax revenue in addition to large spending cuts. Earlier Friday, the Senate rejected a bill from the Republican-controlled House that would have required a balanced-budget amendment and massive cuts, but no tax hikes.
The Senate also set aside immediate plans to consider a bipartisan measure to raise the federal debt limit and avert a government default, leaving it to the House to approve such a plan first. The moves were made in the hope that the House could pass the so-called “grand bargain” to reduce the deficit and raise the debt ceiling next week.
As Obama spoke, Senate Majority Leader Reid blamed the breakdown of the talks on Republican “ideological opposition” to eliminating tax loopholes for big business and corporate CEOs.
“I applaud President Obama for insisting that any deal to reduce our deficit be balanced between cuts and revenues. We must avert a default at all costs, so it is time to reengage in bipartisan talks on an agreement that at least accomplishes that goal,” Reid said in a statement.
His counterpart, McConnell, blamed “the president’s call for higher taxes on American families and job creators,” and he urged that congressional leaders move something to the floor very quickly.
“As I’ve said before, it’s time now for the debate to move out of a room in the White House and onto the House and Senate floors where we can debate the best approach to reducing the nation’s unsustainable debt,” McConnell said.
Earlier in the day, speaking at a town hall meeting at the University of Maryland in College Park, Obama told a largely supportive audience, “We can’t just close our deficit with spending cuts alone.” That would mean senior citizens would have to “pay a lot more for Medicare,” students would have trouble getting education loans, job training programs would be trimmed and there were be “devastating cuts” in medical and clean-energy research, he said.
“If we only did it with cuts, if we did not get any revenue to help close this gap . . . then a lot of ordinary people would be hurt, and the country as a whole would be hurt,” Obama said. “And that doesn’t make any sense. It’s not fair. And that’s why I’ve said, if we’re going to reduce our deficit, then the wealthiest Americans and the biggest corporations should do their part as well.”
Obama and Boehner spoke a day after their talks on a far-reaching deficit-reduction plan ran into a revolt from Democrats furious that the accord appeared to include no immediate provision to raise taxes.
With 11 days left until the Treasury begins to run short of cash, Obama and Boehner were pursuing the most ambitious plan to restrain the national debt in at least 20 years. Talks focused on sharp cuts in agency spending and politically painful changes to cherished health and retirement programs aimed at saving roughly $3 trillion over the next decade.
Staff writer Felicia Sonmez contributed to this report.
Loading...
Comments