But what’s particularly notable is how the good news on earnings came about. It’s not from higher sales. In fact, only 40 percent of the companies that have reported beat analyst forecasts on their revenues. In other words, corporate America found other ways to become more profitable in the third quarter, squeezing expenses such as worker salaries to improve their bottom line even when their top line wasn’t doing all that well.
The FactSet numbers cover only the publicly traded companies that report their results each quarter. But Alan Levenson, the chief economist of T. Rowe Price, has a method for extracting a quick-and-dirty picture of how corporate America as a whole is doing, from the quarterly report on gross domestic product.
Levenson looks at the output by the corporate sector relative to unit labor cost, or pay to workers relative to their production. The results show profit margins staying at historically elevated levels in the July-through-September quarter.
And things aren’t looking great for future revenue, either. According to the FactSet numbers, 62 companies have issued negative guidance about their expected profits, versus 24 who put out positive projections.
Here’s what these numbers may tell us: Even with some apparent improvement in the job market in the past few months, employers still feel no real pressure to sweeten their wages to get good workers. That sentiment matches the flat wages reported in recent jobs reports.
And while workers don’t have the negotiating strength to demand higher pay, allowing businesses to keep improving their profit margins, the economy isn’t growing fast enough to make sales rise in any meaningful way. That allows businesses to increase their earnings even when revenue isn’t rising much.
So, why is revenue rising so slowly? The easy answer is the one that all those companies have used in their earnings conference calls. The global economy is slowing, with Europe likely in recession and key emerging markets such as China and Brazil downshifting their economies’ pace of growth. For worldwide firms, those weakening global economies quickly translate to slower sales increases.
Businesses also have been anxious about the “fiscal cliff,” specifically potential tax hikes and spending cuts. It is less clear how much the politics of the budget debate factored into the third-quarter results and the upward pressure on profit margins. One could imagine some companies putting off purchases of large capital goods to see how things are resolved. To see just what damage that fear caused, we can wait for the fourth-quarter numbers.