As Apple and Samsung vie over tablet patents, judge at center of a tech storm

As Apple and Samsung escalated a multibillion-dollar war over one of the hottest consumer gadgets of our time, the tablet computer, a little-known judge did for Apple what the company couldn’t do on its own: She shut down the competition.

The stunning move by U.S. District Judge Lucy H. Koh to temporarily order Samsung’s tablets off the shelves last month rippled across the tech industry because her decision came as sales of the devices are surging. Samsung’s Galaxy Tab was one of the few 10-inch screen tablets that could go toe-to-toe with Apple’s iPad.

(John Stubler) - Judge Lucy Koh

More tech stories

Dish Network campaigns against SoftBank in bid for Sprint

Dish Network campaigns against SoftBank in bid for Sprint

As it tries to win a bidding war, Dish raises national security concerns against Japan’s SoftBank.

Sir Jony Ive’s new iOS 7: ‘black, white, and flat’

Sir Jony Ive’s new iOS 7: ‘black, white, and flat’

Apple is expected to reveal a new iOS 7 at its Worldwide Developer Conference. And there are some big changes in store.

All about Waze: Why Google or Facebook might want it

All about Waze: Why Google or Facebook might want  it

As more firms add social data to their maps, the community-based navigation app is looking attractive.

“If she wasn’t known before, she is now,” said Florian Mueller, an intellectual-property analyst who runs the patent blog FOSS Patents. “Her decisions on these cases will be cited a lot going forward.”

For Koh, the reason for the sales ban was clear.

“Although Samsung has a right to compete, it does not have a right to compete unfairly, by flooding the market with infringing products,” Koh wrote in her opinion last month. She said Apple would be “irreparably harmed” if sales of the Galaxy Tab continued.

Now, as the case heads to a jury trial this month, all eyes are on the 43-year-old judge. Apple, with 63 percent of the market, and Samsung, with a nearly 9 percent share, rank one and two among tablet makers.

On the one hand, Koh is the ideal person to review such suits. She is an expert on intellectual-property law, having practiced patent litigation for about a decade in private practice. In 2006, as a lawyer at McDermott Will & Emery, she represented Creative Technology in a federal suit accusing Apple of infringing patents with its iPod music player. Apple countersued but ended up paying Creative $100 million for licensing fees.

On the other hand, she is a rookie judge who was appointed by President Obama in 2010. In just one year, she has taken on hundreds of cases, and she now grapples with the massive attention the tablet and smartphone patent suits have drawn from the captains of the high-tech industry.

It’s a baptism by fire, said Judge Ronald M. Whyte, a noted expert on patent law and Koh’s mentor on the District Court in San Jose. He said it is typical to see Koh working extremely long hours, cutting her vacations short for work and coming in to study cases on weekends.

“She isn’t afraid to take things head-on,” Whyte said. “She takes things very seriously.”

The case before Koh is one in an array of lawsuits playing out in courtrooms around the world as tablet and smartphone makers use patents not only to protect their ideas but also to weaken their rivals.

Apple’s push in the courts partly stems from Steve Jobs, the late chief executive of Apple, who said he was willing to declare “thermonuclear war” on his rivals to protect the iPhone and iPad, according to a biography written by Walter Isaacson.

In April 2011, Apple sued Samsung in the U.S. District Court of the Northern District of California for allegedly copying Apple’s products, even though Samsung was a major supplier of screens for those gadgets.

Loading...

Comments

Add your comment
 
Read what others are saying About Badges