The Washington Post

CISPA critics bolstered by veto threat

While opposition to the controversial cybersecurity bill CISPA has not been on the same level as last year’s grassroots groundswell against the anti-piracy bill SOPA, opponents of the bill got a boost late Tuesday when the Obama administration said the president would veto the bill — officially known as the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act — in its current form.

CISPA is designed to make it easier for private companies to share cyberthreat information with the government, and is expected to go for a vote on the House floor this week. But opponents of the measure say the bill would let the government access users’ personal information without a warrant and overrides the existing privacy policies in place at Web firms.

The White House, which threatened to veto a version of the bill last year, issued a Statement of Administrative Policy late Tuesday saying the latest version of the legislation does not provide adequate privacy protections.

“[The] Administration still seeks additional improvements and if the bill, as currently crafted, were presented to the President, his senior advisors would recommend that he veto the bill,” the statement said.

Social media users also are mobilizing following comments from bill co-sponsor Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) at a House Rules Committee hearing that characterized the main critics of the bill as “people on the Internet [...] you know, a 14-year-old tweeter in the basement.” He went on to say that once the bill is explained properly that most people agree with its provisions.

Thousands of Twitter users have been sending messages to Rogers on the social network with their ages (and, in some cases, the position of their workplaces in relation to the ground) as a way to demonstrate that there are more opponents to the bill than he may think.

Rogers’ office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the reaction. The congressman’s official Twitter account has sent a message linking to a list of “19 Privacy Improvements” that have been made to the bill since fall 2011.

Other opponents of the bill include Mozilla, Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the American Civil Liberties Union, which said Wednesday that it believes that the bill “still fails to adequately protect our privacy.”

Related stories:

Digital rights activists vow to fight CISPA

CISPA’s reintroduction stirs new debate

Sign up today to receive #thecircuit, a daily roundup of the latest tech policy news from Washington and how it is shaping business, entertainment and science.

Hayley Tsukayama covers consumer technology for The Washington Post.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
From clubfoot to climbing: Double amputee lives life of adventure
Learn to make traditional soup dumplings
Deaf banjo player teaches thousands
Play Videos
Unconventional warfare with a side of ale
The rise and fall of baseball cards
How to keep your child safe in the water
Play Videos
'Did you fall from heaven?': D.C.'s pick-up lines
5 ways to raise girls to be leaders
How much can one woman eat?
Play Videos
How to get organized for back to school
How to buy a car via e-mail
The signature drink of New Orleans

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.