But is it really that bad? Well, honestly, no.
It’s not great — that’s definitely true. The fly-over footage has serious issues. Big chunks of Ontario, Canada’s largest province, seem to be just missing. But Consumer Reports, which is known for its detailed and objective reports, provides a little outside-the-echo-chamber sanity.
Consumer Reports’ bottom line?
Wow. That’s a little different than what we’ve been hearing. And it provides a useful counterpoint to the pile-on-the-bandwagon type behavior the blogosphere, which can be a little high school from time to time, has been engaging in.
The reality is, every mapping solution has its challenges — even the admittedly awesome Google Maps, which has sent people with medical problems on a wild goose chase while trying to find a medical center.
Apple’s problem is that is replaced best-in-class with pretty-good. That is a very risky proposition, as marketing guru Seth Godin indicates, because people are much more sensitive to what they’re losing than to what they’re gaining.
Consumer Reports liked App Maps’ interface, signage, and points of interest info. But Google has better reporting on traffic conditions and transit information such as train stations. And, of course, it’s a more mature solution.
There’s no doubt that Google Maps are better than Apple Maps. But it was intriguing to read Consumer Reports’ thoughts on the media frenzy:
Google Maps gets the nod, as it should. But Apple’s Maps isn’t a complete train wreck.
Maybe it’s just that we’ve come to expect better from Apple.
Hat tip: ModMyI.com
Copyright 2012, VentureBeat