In a statement, Twitter backed up the sentiments of its top lawyer.
“For years, people have relied on Google to deliver the most relevant results anytime they wanted to find something on the Internet,” the company’s public relations team said in an e-mailed statement. “As we’ve seen time and time again, news breaks first on Twitter; as a result, Twitter accounts and Tweets are often the most relevant results. We’re concerned that as a result of Google’s changes, finding this information will be much harder for everyone. We think that’s bad for people, publishers, news organizations and Twitter users.”
Over at the technology blog Searchblog, John Batelle said Google’s decision to include Google+ information without working out deals with companies such as Twitter or Facebook shows how competition between the companies has hurt the neutral Web.
“It’s not Google’s fault, entirely, but it’s sad nonetheless,” Batelle wrote.
In response to those criticisms, Google said it doesn’t have access to all of the social graph, but would be “open” to partnering with other services to provide personalized results, as long as it could have some control over those results.
“As always, our goal is to provide you with the most relevant and comprehensive search results possible,” said Google in an e-mailed company statement. “However, Google does not have access to crawl all the information on some sites, so it’s not possible for us to surface all that content. Google also doesn’t have access to the social graph information from some sites, so it’s not possible to help you find information from those people you’re connected to. We’d certainly be open to helping people more easily find information from other services, but we’d want to make sure we were providing a consistent user experiences with meaningful control.”
Google launches personal search tool linked with social media
Google punishing Chrome for 60 days
CES 2012: Google TV devices coming from LG, Sony and Vizio