Why Siri is facing its biggest competitor to date in S Voice

Oli Scarff/GETTY IMAGES - A man uses 'Siri' on the iPhone 4S.

Apple's Siri, introduced as the big new feature in the iPhone 4S, is facing its biggest competitor to date in Samsung's S Voice, an extremely similar voice-activated mobile assistant that will make its retail debut with the Galaxy S III early next week. In anticipation of that time, I've brought the two together for a side-by-side comparison to determine which performs better at the daily tasks one might wish to entrust to a robot-voiced virtual assistant.

The first thing to say is that neither Siri nor S Voice is particularly good. Both demand that you enunciate studiously if you care to have your query recognized, and even then some hilarious misinterpretations can and do occur. That's a big stumbling block for any piece of software that aims to streamline your user experience with a smartphone — if you have to repeat or correct yourself, you might as well use more conventional means to achieve your goal. Similarly, both Siri and S Voice have a tendency to rely on external search engines for their results, sometimes integrating them in stub form within the app and sometimes throwing you out to a Google search. S Voice does the latter quite a bit more often than Siri does.

More tech stories

Apple TV brings HBO Go, Watch ESPN to some subscribers

Apple TV brings HBO Go, Watch ESPN to some subscribers

Apple’s set-top box will also have content from Crunchyroll, Sky News and Qello.

Nintendo faces questions over ‘conflict mineral’ policy

Nintendo faces questions over ‘conflict mineral’ policy

Group plans major protest calling for Nintendo to disclose details about its use of conflict minerals.

Having problems with your Netflix? You can blame Verizon.

Having problems with your Netflix? You can blame Verizon.

If you are trying to get Netflix and use Verizon’s broadband, then there is a good chance that your video performance is less than optimal.

In terms of speed, Siri has a distinct advantage over S Voice. It consistently provides an answer ahead of its Samsung competitor. On the other hand, S Voice can actually perform geographical searches whereas Siri seems to think everythingI search for is within the UK and refuses to try and help with locational queries. Siri is also a lot more vocal than Samsung's application. The majority of queries sent to the iPhone are greeted with an aural affirmation of some sort, whereas S Voice tends to provide results quietly (and also includes the option to turn off audio responses altogether). Which of the two approaches you prefer will be a matter of personal preference.

Taken in totality, I would say that S Voice offers a very good approximation of what Siri adds to the iPhone — helping you take notes, look things up, schedule meetings, or check the weather — but that extra functionality isn't yet useful or polished enough to make these voice assistants a real selling point for new phones.

Technical notes: Both the iPhone 4S (Siri) and the Galaxy S III (S Voice) were connected to the same mobile network (Three UK) and to the same Wi-Fi network, the latter providing a 10Mbps connection.

This article was originally published on theverge.com - Siri vs. S Voice: battle of the robot-voiced assistants

Loading...

Comments

Add your comment
 
Read what others are saying About Badges