Oh boy, what is going to happen to the ego of Jeff Contompasis? It’s one thing to have his photo plastered across the top of last week’s Style Conversational, but this column is what management calls “a niche blog”; i.e., hardly anybody reads it. It’s quite different to be portrayed by a big-shot artist and featured at the top of the back page of The Washington Post’s Sunday Style section, where his portrait will be gazed upon by untold dozens of people.
Fortunately, Jeff is by all accounts a lovable, gracious guy, pride of daughters Emily and Saralinda (response to one of Dad’s recent entries: “Ewwww!”). And of course, nobody gets 308 blots of Invite ink without being funny and clever. And so we in the Loser Community are apt to look fondly on the proudly nerdy 48-year-old chemical engineer, even when he makes posts like this on the Style Invitational Devotees page on Facebook: “For the 05OCT2012 Scrabble Grams puzzle, what was wrong with SNUDDLE? It’s obviously a combination of snuggle and cuddle. Sheesh.” Or: “The situation has become intolerable. I must speak out. A solution for a Scrabble Grams puzzle contained REVALUE which does not appear in the online Scrabble dictionary. What am I to believe any longer?”
Jeff’s endearing geekiness has been a running Loser joke for years — something fellow Loser Nan Reiner wrote to honor him as Loser of the Year at the 2011 Flushies, a parody of “That’s Entertainment” (full lyrics here):
The nerd – who’ll dissect every word
With intent – scatological bent,
Spouting math – like a true psychopath:
(See farther down for details about the 2013 Flushies — this Saturday!)
In any case, Jeff’s ScrabbleGrams contest idea is, to us, a good enough reason to put out another neologism contest. I’m using this long list of 100 possibilities to minimize duplication and allow for maximum funny. But — and this occurred to me just this morning — I would go insane judging it if I couldn’t use my computer’s search function to find every entry for one particular letter group, then search on the next one. So heed that boldface warning in the introduction to the contest: If you don’t state the particular letter group your neologism is based on — or if you don’t state the letters in that group in the exact order that the list shows — I am not going to come across it in my search, and its brilliance will go unappreciated even more promptly than it will otherwise.
How about using two or more of these letter sets to form multi-word terms? I’m not averse to this in principle — we’ve had many great two-word neologisms in the past — but each set would have to form a single, significant word; I don’t want two sets to be one big 14-letter pool, or even for one to be just the source for a short prefix or suffix.
Oooooo! Vowel oh vowel, what a bunch of univocalic headlines
As soon as I posted the Week 1017 contest four weeks ago, the Losers’ questions started streaming in on the Devotees page:
Q. “May we use contractions to avoid certain vowels? “Didn’t” if we’re using only “i” or “He’s” if we’re only using “e” as examples. A. Yes.